Originally posted by Amaterasu


I think the point you are missing is that, though I cannot assign 100% to 2+2=4, on a practical level, I function as if 2+2 always = 4. Because I tend to function as if anything that gets 90% or more in my estimation is reliable.

Originally posted by alexandrelois

Originally posted by Amaterasu


I think the point you are missing is that, though I cannot assign 100% to 2+2=4, on a practical level, I function as if 2+2 always = 4. Because I tend to function as if anything that gets 90% or more in my estimation is reliable.

From the standpoint of mysticism 2 +2 does not always equal to 4

From the standpoint of mysticism 2 +2 does not always equal to 4