It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
KABUL, Afghanistan – The Netherlands became the first NATO country to end its combat mission in Afghanistan, drawing the curtain Sunday on a four-year operation that was deeply unpopular at home and even brought down a Dutch government.
Canada has announced it will withdraw its 2,700 troops in 2011 and Polish President Bronislaw Komorowski has promised to pull out his country's 2,600 soldiers the year after.
Originally posted by buni11687
Im thinking the Dutch have their priorities straight when it comes to a pointless war. Canada is number 2. Im going to guess that the US will say, "Dont worry, we are still this close to winning this war and dont need anyone elses help and the war will be over really soon." A couple years later......the US will say the same thing.
Originally posted by bruxfinn
Actually this should be interpreted as the Dutch are the latest casualty of the Afghan War.
Don't be fooled ... the last man on the battlefield wins the war ... simple as that.
The US has been trying to stabilize the massive power vacuum that they left in Afghanistan. Whether or not you are for/against the war, that is the reason that troops stayed, patrolled, and why the US started actually implementing a new democratic Afghanistan government.
Originally posted by truthquest
The war was lost in 2001 when Osama left for Pakistan. We only stuck around because the CIA wanted a cut of the heroin and Exxon wanted the oil. And that is the real reason why we went in. With the proof of that being OBL left and we were still there for "no reason".
Originally posted by wcitizen
reply to post by Zaxxon
I don't suppose the 9 billion dollars which 'went missing' had anything to do with them staying on, or to get the heroin industry pumped up, or the oil, or the millions the military corporations make from the war...had anything to do with them staying?
Funny how they didn't find Osama BL...which was their reason for going there.....but there again, they didn't find WMD in Iraq either. I wonder if they'll find nuclear bombs in Iran!
[edit on 1-8-2010 by wcitizen]
The US didn't go into Afghanistan because war lords were running the country. And I never said so. I said that they stayed after creating a power vacuum. I guess you think I meant that, because I used the word "resume". I meant that the war lords would in fact resume the control that was lost by destabilizing the power that was already there - Al Qaeda.
Originally posted by wcitizen
reply to post by Zaxxon
Why is it any business of US or anyone else if the warlords run Afghanistan? That's an Afghan problem for the Afghan people to sort out. It ABSOLUTELY doesn't jiustify invading their country.
Originally posted by truthquest
Originally posted by bruxfinn
Actually this should be interpreted as the Dutch are the latest casualty of the Afghan War.
Don't be fooled ... the last man on the battlefield wins the war ... simple as that.
If someone wins a war that means they will get some advantage from it. If US is the last one standing in the war they still end up with nothing to show for it. The stated mission of the war was to capture Osama Bin Ladin. Afghanistan was therefore a total, complete, and absolute failure. The entire chain of command should be executed immediately... yes, they screwed up that badly.
Just kidding about execution, the whole war was a joke in the first place. They never intended to find Osama Bin Ladin even though that was their stated goal, they just want to piss away our tax dollars while foolishly hoping the economy will get a war boost and a plunder boost. So yes, the longer the US is in the country, the more the politicians "win", because they will get exactly what they went in for: pissing away money while looting a little bit of plunder here and there. Bruxfinn, maybe when they win like you say they will send you a postcard showing their new 300B+ oil & gas contracts for the elite lobbyist groups that they spent 600B+ of our money getting.
And that is what middle and middle-upper class neocons just don't get... sure the US really is plundering hundreds of billions in resources from countries, which no doubt makes them (neocons) very happy. But look at the trillions of dollars spent to get them... its a net loss any way for every one except for the lobbyists and resource extraction companies. The longer the war goes on the more the US loses even after the looting is taken into account.
The war was lost in 2001 when Osama left for Pakistan. We only stuck around because the CIA wanted a cut of the heroin and Exxon wanted the oil. And that is the real reason why we went in. With the proof of that being OBL left and we were still there for "no reason".
[edit on 1-8-2010 by truthquest]
CIA Red Cell
A Red Cell Special Memorandum 11 March 2010
Afghanistan: Sustaining West European Support for the NATO-led
Mission—Why Counting on Apathy Might Not Be Enough (C//NF)
The fall of the Dutch Government over its troop commitment to Afghanistan
demonstrates the fragility of European support for the NATO-led ISAF mission.
Some NATO states, notably France and Germany, have counted on public
apathy about Afghanistan to increase their contributions to the mission, but
indifference might turn into active hostility if spring and summer fighting
results in an upsurge in military or Afghan civilian casualties and if a Dutchstyle
debate spills over into other states contributing troops.
If domestic politics forces the Dutch to depart, politicians elsewhere might cite a precedent for “listening to the voters.” French and German leaders have over the past two years taken steps to preempt an upsurge of opposition but their vulnerability may be higher now:
Originally posted by Zaxxon
I remember, when I was involved, there was a report of finding things such as chemically laced motar shells in Iraq that was never covered by the MSM. And of course the MSM never really covered that the that the UN reported that Iraq was researching and developing biological chemical warfare. Remember WMD's aren't just Nukes.