It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wcitizen
TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT THEM IS A RISK TO 'NATIONAL SECURITY' !!!???
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
reply to post by tristar
? Are you threatening Wikileaks on behalf of the US government?
Originally posted by truthy-bird
Originally posted by tristar
Anyone care to share his contacts within the gov, or is this a taboo topic although it has its virtual logo. Wiki, we did specifically outline and in plain English, " we don't play games" Enjoy your limited fame.
tristar, If your a scholars, only if ? Can you tell us why there is there a war in afgan ? If you answer is civil war. Big horn sound, you failed. You also failed american history! Civil war made America into a great country... without any foreign help ! America grew out of it, so they will. Have faith mister "in god we trust". Remember "nam" ? Look at it today. In a sense, university is like a prison, you meet people with same interest beside learning/reforming your self.
G's country fathering other countries is just ridicule, or there really not good fathers. Maybe mothers should take over! I guess for now, super hero Assange is redefining "your rules" and "your game" and on an international level. What a intelligent man he is, regardless of is true intention.
Originally posted by ACTruthseeker
Interesting - it seems to me though that wikileaks has neglected the number one covered-up issue and that is the issue of UFO's and ETI. There are literally thousands of whistle blowers from all areas of govt. military and law enforcement that have come forward.
If you are interested in the truth about these matters I suggest looking at The Conscious Connection
[edit on 2-8-2010 by ACTruthseeker]
You have to start with the truth. The truth is the only way that we can get anywhere. Because any decision-making that is based upon lies or ignorance can't lead to a good conclusion." "We do not have national security concerns. We have concerns about human beings,"
Originally posted by LarryLove
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by LarryLove
Larry, you did a good job on this yourself here.
What's more interesting to me too is which MSM outlet is reporting what and how. That shows us how they're aligning on this matter and who might be their masters. Weird as that may sound.
Props to you both.
[edit on 8/1/2010 by ~Lucidity]
Thank you and you make a good point. I too would like to know the answer to the question you raise. Take The Times article cited in the opening post. It is clear that an editorial decision was taken to make you initially think that releasing the documents has already caused the death of an informant. Well, The Times is owned by Mr Murdoch.