It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by freedommusic
Here is the entire response email w/ my original email quoted.
Hang in the (my name), you almost got it!
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 11:12:16PM +0100, (my name) wrote:
> > Am I getting closer?
> > --------
> > #AES PASSWORD == ONION
> > $ openssl enc -d -aes256 -in insurance.aes256 > out_ONION_AES.dec
> > #BF PASSWORD == ROUTER
> > $ openssl enc -d -bf -in insurance.aes256 > out_ROUTER_BF.dec
> > #BF PASSWORD == ONION
> > $ openssl enc -d -bf -in insurance.aes256 > out_ONION_BF.dec
> > --------
Originally posted by JBA2848
reply to post by CommandoJoe
If it wasn't that easy you wouldn't have cracked wares. You wouldn't have copied cds or dvds. You wouldn't have piracy on the internet. Nobody cares when its just a cd, video game or some over priced software. But now the government is coming down on them and those same ones who were ignored are now a problem. The science behind what those crackers were doing is now being turned on the government.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
You dont come off as crazy at all. You come off as someone trying to sound like a conspiracy theorist who is rather bad at it. But, at least, your level of approach is slightly more intelligent than some of the yahoos they throw at us.
Well, actually, you are. And, that agenda, coincidentally, is the same one being pushed at the American people in virtually all media. Even that targeted at non-conspiracy theorists. You are just using the conspiracy option for this website. Your bottom line is, "Wikileaks is dangerous and cant be trusted." Its the same bottom line as the governments bottom line being pushed by the MSM, only tailored for conspiracy theorists.
Wikileaks does not target the US. It will leak any data it is sent, about any nation. In this case, they received a big leak about the US. The fact that he is a long time hacker doesnt make him less credible. It might if he were a cracker, who hacked just to show his stuff so that the PTB would pay him, (like Lamo) but he isnt. He has a demonstrated past of ethically motivated behavior, not profit driven behavior.
Is that what they believe in? Anonymity? Because the best way to be anonymous over the internet is not to start a website that stirs up the worlds leaders. They believe in providing information that is being withheld from the worlds people, and they offer anonymity to the leakers for their protection to accomplish that end. The "faction" they represent is the majority of the worlds people. Us, the nameless, faceless peons who are chess pieces on the world board, but who, through lack of information, cannot actually move the pieces in a meaningful way, even though many of us live in "democracies."
Originally posted by Smack
reply to post by JBA2848
I have to say, your naivete is risible.
You've been informed already as to the herculean nature of the task to which you now so earnestly apply yourself. Perhaps you will learn something of far greater value than anything you might find in the file upon which you labor so furiously -- humility.
Originally posted by JBA2848
Came from here.
Secret killing program is key in Iraq, Woodward says
"I would somewhat compare it to the Manhattan Project in World War II," he said "It's a ski slope right down in a matter of months, cutting the violence in half. This isn't going to happen with the bunch of joint security stations or the surge."
The top secret operations, he said, will "some day in history ... be described to people's amazement."
In the future, when the threads start crawling into knots, I can just kick certain weak threads offline, kill their processes. And I can guide certain strong threads into an orderly braid of my own design.
It blows my mind. I know this might sound obscure, but that's how the manipulation is working. That's why the govt is so interested in social networks.