I still think it could be the Iraq files

Originally posted by schuyler


This leads me to believe either that it is fake, or that it has been padded so that it appears huge. This could have been done either to make it appear menacing, or to make it difficult to move around. I downloaded a Garmin GPS map update a few days ago that was about a gig on my normal DSL line. It took several hours to do it.

I think it's either a video or a few different videos and maybe some memos/paper stuff

Originally posted by Detergent
Second: Part of deciphering information is knowing when it has been successfully deciphered. If my life depended on the data, I'd make sure it was encrypted at multiple levels, Russian-doll-style. Someone with really good computers might successfully decipher the first level. But how would they know they'd done so when the result just looks like another stream of random bits and not some recognizable words or document signature? And what if the attacker doesn't know how many layers of encryption are present? You can see that the problem is mind-numbing. The complexity goes up exponentially with the layers of encryption.

Which is why I am not at all interested at this point in the decryption of the insurance files...despite my complete lack of computer/coding wherewithal.

I would expect it it to be of high caliber with safeguards and redundancy...

But speculation I can do...

My opinion, not worth much:

The stuff in the "Insurance" file is related to things like the racial slurs and bigoted remarks said to have been in the original 200k + that were reported to have been given to Wikileaks. I would expect that data was combined with stuff they already had.



But i would further state that it seems that there is a battle going on at high levels. I do not trust Wikileaks. Not fully. But then i do not trust anyone other than myself, my wife, my mother, and my son. And i don't trust any of them completely with everything (i know my son will eat my candy bar if given a chance, for a silly example).

Regardless, all i do with Wiki is what i do with others. I take it for what its worth, apply logic to what it says, and examine within the overall context. In the end what i am left with is, if nothing else, validation that the government that is supposed to represent me has completely gone astray (and likely has been in such a state since in the end of WWII).

Ok so we could have encryption within encryption at different levels and that complicates things. I wonder if it is possible with the 'straw bottle' hint if a key or password could be in a constant process of changing, meaning that the program used to encrypt would put into play a process where there would be a set of keys or passwords that would change on an hourly, daily or weekly basis. Would anyone know if this is feasible, possible or practical?

I wouldn't be surprised if the key is already on the wikileaks website already and visible, the challenge here is to try and find it...lol

Straw and glass bottle is the directory where all the other files are located on that page too, so I doubt it's anything to take notice to.

Does anyone think that this is thier false flag to pass the Cyber Security Bill??? I do!!!!

The 'straw bottle' hint was reference to the revolving straw on the bottle experiment, psychokinesis.

Originally posted by resist the nwo
Does anyone think that this is thier false flag to pass the Cyber Security Bill??? I do!!!!

I've always had that in the back of my mind and look at it as a good possibility.

Does anyone know why the filesize of the file on wikileaks keeps changing?
The one i got directly from the wikileaks site is only 214MB.