The simple reality of 9/11, what we know and what we don't, page 20
Pages: <<  17    18    19    20  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 91 times


reply posted on 13-8-2010 @ 02:15 AM by JohnJasper
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to
post by JohnJasper



Barry Jennings was not alone during his experience in WTC 7 on the morning of 9/11, he was accompanied by Michael Hess.

The idea that he experienced an explosion prior to the collapse of either tower just isn't tenable. According to his testimony he went up to the OED by elevator. However, while he and Hess were in the OED the power went out. He refers to the blank screens and this is why he and Hess had to try and exit by the stairs. It is known that the power went out at 9.59 am when WTC 2 collapsed. Jennings says he made some calls from the OED and then he and Hess started to make their way down the stairs.

They were trapped at the eighth floor by explosion and damage. The obvious inference is that this was the result of falling debris from the collapse of WTC 1 at 10.28 am.



Perhaps you'll have a different view if you watch the uncut version of the interview. It's available at this link.

If, as you say, "The obvious inference is that this was the result of falling debris from the collapse of WTC 1 at 10.28 am.", why didn't Barry Jennings come to this conclusion?

If you watched the whole interview, perhaps you noticed several other anomalies such as the severe damage to the lobby, the multiple explosions while awaiting rescue, dead bodies in the lobby, the mayor being evacuated...

Keep in mind that none of this happened in a vacuum. Watch/read all of the evidence and keep track of all of the unexplained explosions in various buildings and locations. Individually, they might be explained away as "stuff happens" but together they add up to serious and justifiable proof that the official story was bunk.


reply posted on 11-9-2010 @ 12:23 PM by airspoon
reply to post by rich23



Yeah, I never saw the show but the same thought crossed my mind. However, I believe that Kissinger is one of them, so even if he were to keep the chair, it would have gone the same way, if not worse. Either way you look at it, I'm sure that the Bush admin or TPTB were determined to fill those positions with men who would aid in the cover-up. In fact, when Bush was first fighting against the investigation, he probably finally agreed when it was explained to him that they could fill the spots with their own lackies. In fact, it actually turned out for the better of those involved.

--airspoon



reply posted on 24-9-2010 @ 02:18 PM by KIZZZY
reply to post by airspoon



S&F

I would like to thank you for such an honest and heart-felt opening Airspoon.

I am sorry I had not seen this thread sooner, but better late than never.

I do agree with what you wrote here and I believe the truth must be

ferreted out.

Thank you!

.


reply posted on 29-9-2010 @ 06:18 AM by Bordon81

I am simply not willing to take anyone's word for what happened, especially because the price is so large.


Very wise, revisionist historians projecting their own special interests have a field day otherwise. Obviously the planning for such a large operation would have to be enormous. It is logical that the CIA was involved back in the 1960's. Without the WTC buildings being designed for early planned obsolescence, such a stunt would be near impossible to pull off. As they say in the X files, "The Truth shall set you free".

There is a conspiracy angle to some accounts of the Pearl Harbor invasion that involves William F. Friedman who eventually became the chief cryptologist for the National Security Agency. That conspiracy parallels your 911 conjecture that the government used 911 to start a war in the middle east.

During WW2 one could make the argument that most of the worlds rotor machine cryptography including the german engima, Japanese purple etc were all a similar design. All rotor machine encrypted information was expected to be readable by the elite government agencies. If that is true than crazy kinds of logical conclusions need to be entertained.
For example:
The USA knew about the planned attack on Pearl Harbor before it happened.
The Allies would have known that the jews were being sent by train to concentration camps.
At the end of WW2 Rommel secretly gave away the German field positions and strengths to the allies.

You get to draw your own conclusions, Had the D day invasion at NORMANDY been made at a more heavily defended location it would have resulted in a blood bath for both sides.

edit on 29-9-2010 by Bordon81 because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  17    18    19    20  >>    ^^TOP^^



Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 12 days ago with 48 member flags
9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags
9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags
What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 8 days ago with 17 member flags
Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 16 days ago with 13 member flags
Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 18 days ago with 9 member flags
British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 8 days ago with 8 member flags