Afghan leak: Wikileaks' Assange denies 'blood on hands', page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times
Topic started on 30-7-2010 @ 07:19 PM by Parallex

Afghan leak: Wikileaks' Assange denies 'blood on hands'


www.bbc.co.uk
The founder of the website Wikileaks has rejected US claims he has blood on his hands after releasing 90,000 leaked classified documents on the Afghan war.

Julian Assange told the BBC there was no evidence that any informants had died as a result of the leaks.

He accused the Pentagon of trying to distract attention from the thousands of lives being lost in the war.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 09:44 PM by loner007
reply to post by hinky



yeah right you are assuming the US and British forces dont "accidently" kill them 1st. Also why are foreign troops in Afghanistan? I am almost certain they was not invited. Another thing if Assange was ever to get blood on his hands it would be far less than the blood on the US And British hands whose jobs is to protect civilians. THey have killed more civilians and friends than they have killed taliban.


reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 10:01 PM by Faiol
guys there are a lot of interviews out there from Assange


he said he offered the opportunity to the US gov to censor the names, they didnt respond

reply to
post by hinky




read above

plus

he said in an interview that all those accusations are non sense, until today there is no proof that any person is in danger and come on ... the US got its chance to save lives, but they choose the other side ...

and their idea is simple: disclose everything ... off course, trying to minimize these dangers but we need them more than anything else

lets hope Assange uses this to release some more heavy stuff to counter them

follow @wikileaks at twitter, a lot of news and interviews are linked there

[edit on 30/7/10 by Faiol]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^