Schwarzenegger to speak at Bohemian Club conclave, page 2

privacy

Pages: << 1 2 3 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 10:37 AM by Romantic_Rebel

reply to post by mordant1

You are a very immature person to say the least. Like I said before it's pointless to argue with a person who want's to act childish. I should have ten dollars an hour reading you comments.

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 10:37 AM by mordant1

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 10:39 AM by MemoryShock

There will be no further discussion of other posters...period.

Speak to the topic or not at all. Further violations will be removed.

Thank you.

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 10:41 AM by kevinunknown

Thanks for ms MS.

So does anybody have any ideas about why he is there, I have to admit my knowledge of this group is quite limited, another poster said something about him being married to a Kennedy what link could that have.

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 10:41 AM by mordant1

reply to post by Romantic_Rebel

You see it as insult, I see it as pointing out factual immaturity proven by your own responses in a conspiracy site and a widely known fact of what goes on ahd BG. There is google and wikapedia.
Sometimes realization of reality is unwanted and unpleasant, we learning requires some degree of humility. I'm trying to get you to learn how to learn and you cant do that until you learn that your opinion is not simply all you need to participate.
I'm TRYING to get you to learn about your premises, and for that you SHOULD thank me.

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 10:42 AM by Romantic_Rebel

reply to post by kevinunknown

Well he is a world famous actor and Governor of California. Do you think those can be contributing factors? Being married to someone shouldn't matter that much. Since it's an individual being a member of the club.

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 10:45 AM by kevinunknown

reply to post by Romantic_Rebel

I would think it has allot more to do with him being the governor of California, like I said i really don’t know much about them other than the basics so it would be interesting for somebody who knows a bit more about it to give their incite.

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 10:49 AM by mordant1

reply to post by kevinunknown

Research bohemian grove there is much to learn and it is not just a party. This is a rabbit hole that goes on and on.
There are a variety of those who say they were victims of ritual pederasty and even involved in ritual murder there. I have no idea but I know that politicians have no valid purpose to enter into secret associations with those that they're supposed to monitor and protect the public from, in fact there's a law against such activity, but who follows laws anymore? Pretty much all of those attending are world depopulationists, so a few recreational murders wouldnt be out of bounds
Here is no good for the public that can come of a wild party of international world movers and shakers.
It's one of the clearest document of an 'us vs them' mindset of financial and political insiders. Sticky wicket, that..

[edit on 30-7-2010 by mordant1]

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 10:51 AM by Big Raging Loner

Here is a draft of his speech I found. It turns out the Bohemian Club is actually an all night rave for the elites.

YouTube Link

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 10:55 AM by kevinunknown

reply to post by Big Raging Loner

You had me there for a bit, i thought you had actually found his speech. If that video was not as funny as it was i would have been unhappy lol.

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 10:59 AM by woodwardjnr

The video I posted will pretty much tell you all you need to know about the grove and who goes there. It's not just politicians the guy who does Homers voice in the Simpsons was invited one year, he actually gives the best description of the Grove. It's basically like one huge fraternity party for the rich to let their hair down for a weekend.

The "cremation of Care" ceremony the one with the 40ft owl and mock human sacrafice, is meant to be the burning away of the worries and cares these big wigs have for the weekend.

Having said that, the idea for the atomic bomb project was meant to have been drawn up at the grove, so maybe it has some more sinister aspects to it.

The opinions range from it being a secret cabal involved in human sacrifice and satanic worship to just a fraternity for the wealthy. Watch the documentary and take your pick.

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 11:05 AM by mordant1

reply to post by woodwardjnr

I for one, look askance at a bunch of ultrapowerful self entitled narcissists drunk on power and drugs pinging off each other. Great, Homers voice. What party dosent have entertainment once in a while?
A lot can go on when the grounds cover more tha a square mile over 17 days. Politicialns are supposed to defend us against these power hoarders, not curry their favor or leak their plans to those who only intend to profit by it, and that's the only reason the would accept an invite.
It should be illegal, and in fact is.
Someone call a cop

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 11:06 AM by Trexter Ziam

Actually it IS primarily Republicans.

Bill Clinton went once though; so, the occassional Democrat is invited.

Maybe they are going to write up a Hawaiin birth certificate for Schwartenegger so he can run for Prezzy. Joking of course.

They obviously have 'plans' for Schwartenegger in the next Presidential. Maybe backing somebody they chose as most likely to fail.

Baal worship.

[edit on 30/7/2010 by Trexter Ziam]

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 11:08 AM by ghaleon12

Yeah it's probably more liberal than anything, considering it's in Cali. People fly in of course but when it started it was more hippie than anything, or bohemian you could say. I'm not sure where I read it but the history of that area is pretty interesting. The bohemian culture that developed is very unique.

If anything I'd say it'd almost be like elite socialism or something. The rich and powerful more than likely know how to get along and maintain their power, but the underlings just fight and are unable to gain power or wealth. The difference in attitude is pretty stark. It's like we take liberty and freedom as a means to wedge ourselves from other people, when those in power actively "group up" in order to better leverage what they already have so they can gain more.

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 11:11 AM by mordant1

reply to post by Trexter Ziam

So Kissinger is a repub" Buffet? How about those from other countries? It matters not, and you cant say with any authority other than your opinion, the accurate makeup of the hundreds of attendees.
isnt it about time to get past a false repub/dem dichotomy? They are buy and large those that say that there are too many people on the planet, if you do the research, so their claimed affilliations matter not. They think you are expendable, they exclude any press coverage, and make no statements to the public that can be verified. What part of that reassures you that your interests are taken to heart by them?
It's about entitlements not available to the public but stolen from the public through collusion of govt officials and a group of insider financiers whos only agenda is power over you.

[edit on 30-7-2010 by mordant1]

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 11:16 AM by Shadowfoot

Nice find OP. Its a pity your thread got taken hostage by a few less than reasonable, or informed people.

As was said on page one, Arnold did marry into the Kennedy/Shriver clan, that alone gives him carte blanche into the elite clubs of the TPTB.

I suspect there are inner and outer activities at these functions. The inner taking place after the less involved have become sufficiently entertained.
I find it interesting that a meeting with Ken Lay initiated Arnolds rise to governing power and I suspect that his presence here carries foreshadowing of a future cabinet position in another administration or perhaps some other high profile position.

Things are on the move for November elections, and these folks that put this Bohemian Grove on year after year would not take the time to bring so many upper eschelon people together for so obtuse a thing as a party...Puh Leeze! No one aspect of this gathering is simply a cover for a more clandestine aspect.

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 11:18 AM by woodwardjnr

reply to post by mordant1

I'm not saying I agree with BG, but some assume that real child sacrifices take place, which I think is stretching the imagination a little.

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 11:37 AM by mordant1

reply to post by woodwardjnr

I've spent many days researching this, so regretfully i'm gonna assume some precedence and not because I'm just just guessing or it's too icky to consider. I've read the testemonies of those that claim victimization, there are pages of them and they are not all form one source. Some people who have spoken up have disappeared.
I always say, dont trust what I say, but do what I did and if you get a different answer, then fine for you, disprove me with facts.
THe OP is about a politician visiting a venue which is notorious and I'm trying to stick to it in spite of attempts to derail things into pure pointless opinion and distraction.
I've repeatedly pointed out the issues regarding politicians shouldnt be allowed to spend time with fatcats, especially when they avoid the peeps,
and unless the op was intended to only serve as a celebrity sighting, I think I'm doing a fairly good job of sticking to and illuminating the spirit of the post, and against great odds I must say.

[edit on 30-7-2010 by mordant1]

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 12:18 PM by Trexter Ziam

Some of us have studied CT and NWO aspects since before most of you were born. I'm NEITHER Republican NOR Democrat. So, your Neocon Disinfo does not apply to me personally.

Since you are a new member who has studied the Bohemian Grove for a mere "few days" and you don't understand the definition of "primarily" in my statement, I suggest you try dictionary.com and perhaps check wiki and Google yourself.

sociology.ucsc.edu... claimed that the 1990's meetings were :

solidly Republican

which is a bit more party-allied than my use of the word "primarily".

Further, EVERY Republican President since 1923 ... but not EVERY Democratic President was a regular member of the Grove.

We all know there are many Republicans dressed as Democrats and visa-versa.

Oddly, I see Schwartenegger as a pseudo Democrat. I'd love to be a fly on the wall and hear what he gets asked and told during this meeting.

reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 12:41 PM by mordant1

reply to post by Trexter Ziam

Neocon? Ahaha.
1990? Wow, can we all go back 20 years and live there with those stats?
So, is the OP is just about the number of repubs in 1990 at BG? Is that the salient point you infer? Neocon? based on what wisdom borne of many many good years?
I'll await your august reply.
PS here's some other replies you can use effectivly of similar intellect:
DICK CHENEY!
George BUSH!
Halliburton!
War for OIL!
Nazi!
ANTISEMITE!
Racist
And that's just for starters

Pages: << 1 2 3 >> ^^TOP^^