Well? When you post a video you people really ought to preview it first (or at least check the link).

We wait with baited breath now......................

Oh geeze. We were better off with a blank screen. Do you realize how old this is??

This is a news/discussion forum. Not an archive for real old news!

At least put "Real Old Video" in your title.

Im sure that video was proved a hoax, other ATSers might know more on this but i think it was well debunked.

Having seen one, Im a firm believer in UFO's, but yes, this has been confirmed, by the maker, that it is a fake.

Originally posted by Catch_a_Fire
Im sure that video was proved a hoax, other ATSers might know more on this but i think it was well debunked.

Everything is debunkable. Even if we filmed ET landing, levitated several Human Beings & a cow into their craft, left some alien metal along with a star map then sped off at 10,000 mph....someone will STILL debunk it.

The trick to life is, find your own truth. Don't wait for a mob-mentality mind-set.
After all: For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.


OP....thanks for including 1989 in your last line

Lmao. It may also help you if you were to check out the info on what you are stating. 1989 too early for compositing? George Mélies created the first film composite in 1902. Pretty sure it is almost never too old to be composited.

And on another note..... STAR WARS?!?!


Edit: I realize you said CGI, but it's just another form of the same thing.

[edit on 30-7-2010 by JohnSmit]

Originally posted by One Moment

The trick to life is, find your own truth. Don't wait for a mob-mentality mind-set.
After all: For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.

Why are you asking people to delude themselves by asking them to believe on faith instead of fact? Also, of course proof is possible, if it existed.

Originally posted by UFOmaster
I would also like to add that this vid was shot in 1989 so no CGI here!!

Actually, CGI exists since the '70s. The video was made by John Whaley (also known as Wheyleigh and Wabe), who worked at a video editing company in the UK called First Cut. He admitted faking the footage and he even showed how he did it.

Originally posted by Radiobuzz

Originally posted by UFOmaster
I would also like to add that this vid was shot in 1989 so no CGI here!!

Actually, CGI exists since the '70s. The video was made by John Whaley (also known as Wheyleigh and Wabe), who worked at a video editing company in the UK called First Cut. He admitted faking the footage and he even showed how he did it.

Thanks you and case closed for at leas the second time.
Lets see how long till it's moved to the hoax forum.

[edit on 30-7-2010 by keepureye2thesky]

Originally posted by Hawkwind.

Originally posted by One Moment

The trick to life is, find your own truth. Don't wait for a mob-mentality mind-set.
After all: For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible.

Why are you asking people to delude themselves by asking them to believe on faith instead of fact? Also, of course proof is possible, if it existed.

Proof is possible if it is allowed to exist

Also, if I were some intelligent being, and I came flying by in my little UFO, i'd probably roll the windows up, lock the doors and be afraid to park it, too.

Just because they're intelligent doesn't mean they can find a logical reason to place themselves in such danger on this chaotic planet.

For those of you who provided background on the OP thank you.

But a word of caution for those who gleefully approach the matter as:

"It is a hoax," "it has been proven to be a hoax," and the most repugnant; "It's a hoax but I'm not telling you how or why I know that." remember... you are at that point making the assertion. If you don't want to, or can't be bothered to explain the assertion - DON'T MAKE IT AT ALL. That is not a contribution, nor does it amplify the OP in any way.

It is the height of ignorance (and perhaps arrogance) to think that your assertion is self-evident in such cases.

It has been stated, (but not referenced), that this film was created by a professional cinematography specialists, and I would have liked to have seen the links and materials that he provided explaining the methodology used to produce it.

PS - I don't mind revisiting this and other such cases frequently, because as it turns out, not everyone can dig through thousands of threads to find previous related content... but those of you who have seen it could do the rest of the board a favor and provide links to what you "know."


[edit on 30-7-2010 by Maxmars]