President Obama calls African-Americans a 'mongrel people' , page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 29-7-2010 @ 11:29 PM by bentai22

President Obama calls African-Americans a 'mongrel people'


thehill.com
President Obama waded into the national race debate in an unlikely setting and with an unusual choice of words: telling daytime talk show hosts that African-Americans are “sort of a mongrel people.”

Obama noted "there's still a reptilian side of our brain" that leads people to not trust others "if somebody sounds different or looks different."
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 29-7-2010 @ 11:39 PM by oozyism
Originally posted by bentai22


I find this interesting in the fact that the Prez is jumping on the bandwagon. One other thing I find interesting is that he refers to our "reptillian" brains. Does he know something that we dont?

I wonder what he means by the reptillian sides of our brains? Were we possibly derived from the reptillian race?


thehill.com
(visit the link for the full news article)


LOL he is just saying humans also have an animalistic side, but to narrow it down to Africans only, or African Americans, shows an agenda.

Who knows, he may want to stay president for ever by sparking a civil war between White and Black, Mexicans in the other side, with hundreds of millions of automatic guns, all type. Perfect recipe for a huge agenda conspiracy building up from US to Israel.



reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 01:46 AM by catwhoknows
reply to post by PennyQ



I don't care if you are watching that - he is still wrong.

Reptiles are innocent creatures, made into monsters by Hollywood and other idiots.

As I stated before, ALL races are mixed.

I don't get the point of your argument. I mean "the reptile side of our brain"? We do not have a reptile side, unless we are reptiles.

And of course so-called white races are involved - we are all mongrels.



reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 01:56 AM by Miraj
reply to post by Megiddodiddo



Or maybe he used a term that's pretty widely used..

Just saying.


reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 02:00 AM by catwhoknows
reply to post by SyphonX



Whatever our basic brain is, forget that reptile thing.

Stop blaming reptiles. Poor things, everyone hates them.

And I am replying thanks to my basic brain, because I do not have a reptilian brain, since I am not a reptile, unfortunately - they are probably nicer to be around than humans.


reply posted on 30-7-2010 @ 02:09 AM by SyphonX
reply to post by catwhoknows



Wikipedia - 'Triune brain'


The triune brain is a model of the evolution of the vertebrate forebrain and behavior proposed by the American physician and neuroscientist Paul D. MacLean. MacLean originally formulated his model in the 1960's and propounded it at length in his 1990 book The Triune Brain in Evolution [1]. The triune brain consists of the reptilian complex (<-- See Below), the paleomammalian complex (limbic system), and the neomammalian complex (neocortex), viewed as structures sequentially added to the forebrain in the course of evolution. The triune brain hypothesis became familiar to a broad popular audience through Carl Sagan's Pulitzer prize winning 1977 book The Dragons of Eden. Though embraced by some psychiatrists and at least one leading affective neuroscience researcher[2], the model never won wide acceptance among comparative neurobiologists. Comparative evolutionary neuroanatomists currently regard its claims about brain evolution to be outdated [3] [4].


The reptilian complex
The reptilian complex, also known as the R-complex or "reptilian brain" was the name MacLean gave to the basal ganglia, structures derived from the floor of the forebrain during development. The term derives from the fact that comparative neuroanatomists once believed that the forebrains of reptiles and birds were dominated by these structures. MacLean contended that the reptilian complex was responsible for species typical instinctual behaviors involved in aggression, dominance, territoriality, and ritual displays.


In other words, it is the name (nickname, metaphorical) to the part of our brain that is the least developed, and more apt to respond to 'basic instinct'. It will probably never develop, and we will most likely maintain a high level of unneeded aggression and basic instinct.

[edit on 30-7-2010 by SyphonX]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^