It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

H.R. 2159, the Disarming American Citizens Act

page: 7
24
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 04:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Come Clean
 





, "I'm on this terrorist list but I'm not a terrorist."


.....and sadly he was never seen again




posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:01 PM
link   
reply to post by Come Clean
 





USA PATRIOT Act (H.R. 3162)



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:02 PM
link   
reply to post by combo_666
 


You live in a Socialist nation, you must be acclimated to it---but stay on your side of the border. YOU ARE GROUNDED, Slave!



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:06 PM
link   
People don't understand that there are 435 US congressmen, and any one of them can introduce a bill. In this case it looks like two congressmen submitted it and it got very little support, not a tangible threat to gun freedoms in the US.

I also find it a little disturbing and evident of fear mongering that the originator of the email automatically associated the bill of two Republican congressmen with Obama's administration without offering any proof.

This email offers a skewed version of reality as it was written for the explicit purpose of drumming up support for the Tea Party and should be taken with a grain of salt.

[edit on 30-7-2010 by beansanmash]



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:07 PM
link   
I confess. The Patriot Act was my idea. I just didn't think that so many people would take it all wrong. Guess I didn't express myself properly.



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:13 PM
link   
reply to post by Xiamara
 

Check it out, check the sources, and then make your own assessment.

en.wikipedia.org...

I am in agreement with about everything that you said with the exception of the idea that Moose are evil.

Namaste and Love



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:15 PM
link   
reply to post by ATSROT
 


Check it out, check the facts and sources, and then make your own assessment.

en.wikipedia.org...

Namaste and Love



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:16 PM
link   
reply to post by ATSROT
 


Creature? Broad Brush?

Isn't that in of itself a very broad statement? Are you not a creature as well?

Namaste and Love



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:17 PM
link   
First and Foremost, I am not for or against the two individuals below.
What has Glen Beck and Sarah Palin done to anyone? Just two people expressing their belief and what they feel the present government is doing.

The present issue today is the present government (president and congress) are taking this Great Country and the majority of the people on these forums in the wrong direction period....

We must continue to express our beliefs and pass on information about the above direction. This will pretend control of our beliefs and resistance to that direction.

Keep up the great work. Continue expressing your beliefs and we will stop the attempted control of The Great USA and Her People.

"Loyalty to the country always. Loyalty to the government when it deserves it." Mark Twain

FREEDOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:22 PM
link   
for evryone who said the gun grab is a dead bill
this years gun grab
www.washingtontimes.com...
Friday, April 9, 2010
A Un treaty that could supersede your constitution.
Remember when El Prezidente addressed your congress to bi partisan support?


[edit on 30-7-2010 by Danbones]

[edit on 30-7-2010 by Danbones]



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:31 PM
link   
IMHO I dont think we will lose our 2nd A. rights to a bill that is brought in broad daylight for every one to see. It will be a quick knee jerk reaction from the PTB.
OK say for instance the south, Az. or any other state tries to secede from the union and it turns in to a civil war. Or the threat of militias being ramped up gets the other guberments on edge. So the UN send in the so called "Peace keepers" or some other world body sends in their troops to stabilize the fractured country "US"

Take Pakistan for example they have nukes and they have terrorists and the two dont mix "from the US view". OK now you have the US with nukes and infighting from different factions north or south black or wight Hispanic against them all who knows? So the world body says "Hey we cant have this riff raff incharge of nuke keys" so welcome the peace keepers or the coalition of who knows what. That way it wont have anything to do with LEOs or our NG. Gun owners will be just insurgents an another target.

I got a new tinfoil hat to day and Im just trying it out



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:33 PM
link   
I spoke with my Congressman Steve Scalise and my Senator David Vitter personally about The UN Small Arms Treaty the day the article you posted above was released.

Both men stated over their dead bodies.

However you are right, We MUST keep our guard up and our voices loud and strong. Both Obama and Hillary are in favor of the treaty.

In God and My Guns I Do Trust!!

Freedommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:44 PM
link   
Is a disarmed American really a Canadian?

Or are Canadians a lot more armed than we give them credit for being?

And on a side note: When, oh, when is Canada going to open up their borders to undocumented Mexicans living in cramped barrios in Los Angles? Canada has sooooo much land. Soooooo many undocumented Mexicans could live in Canada, have anchor babies in Canada's socialized hospitals.

And what is this talk about the French Army contemplating buying the 'cheaper' Chinese made assault rifles? Will this affect French Canadians who are also in a quandry about the reliability of 'Cheaper to purchase' Chinese made assault rifles?

Guns. There's just never enough good conversation about guns.

Funny Failed French Missile Test
So funny, make sure you watch right 'til the end.
www.youtube.com...



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:45 PM
link   
reply to post by mnemeth1
 


I don't believe you even read what I wrote other than the first line. Had you, you would have realized that Democrats are going to get the guns, but not the traditional method in which they tackle the 2nd Amendment.

And for anyone that still thinks keeping a look-out on the Supreme Court agenda for indication there's a problem, you are looking in the wrong direction -- exactly where they want you to look.


A decade ago, the calculus was simple: Those who wanted greater gun control aligned with the Democrats. And those who wanted fewer restrictions on guns turned to the Republicans.

No longer.


Source: www.cbsnews.com...

Again, the government is completely managing to get all of you to look in the wrong direction.



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Danbones
 

I agree on that Obama had a Chair in the UN Security Council in 09 so how do we know he didnt give his approval to run us through


Off topic, I thought it was against con. law for a pres. to occupy two seats of governing during his term.



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:49 PM
link   
I'm beginning to think that Obama was a test tube child actually created by the NRA - every time he blinks at a picture of a gun or thinks of the letter g 800 new guns are sold in America.

I know some fools who bought 8 maybe 10 guns last year and enough ammo to win a small war all based on him being elected.

Its kinda funny but I'd sooner believe the rumor that a law has passed requiring everyone to join the nra than one stating the sky is blue at this point.



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 06:42 PM
link   
reply to post by nivekronnoco
 


Source please?
I truly do not understand where you got all of that.
Are you trolling?
Thank you in advance sir.


(Edit)
I see I read all of your previous posts and I fully understand who you are.

[edit on 30-7-2010 by g146541]



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 07:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by doctorwork
It appears that this bill is dead in the water; BUT, they will try again, and again, and one day, we'll all say, "its dead in the water," and one will pass. Then they have us by the balls.
Eric Holder must go.
Barry Soetoro must go.
All the thugs must go, but first they must be clearly recognized for what they are and what their goals really are.


HERE HERE! I SECOND THIS (ahem...) NOBLE GESTURE!! WHY THE CONSTITUION NEVER HAD THIS NOBLE CLAUSE BUILT INTO IT AS A DUTY TO HOLD OFFICE IS BEYOND THE REST OF US!!

to recognize a rat is to acknowledge the voting record on file at the .gov site registering that branch of goovermint actoon...

RECOGNIZE A RAT BY THIER VOTING RECORD...

Did they violate thier oaths to uphold and defend Constitutional Law?


Treason is the Constitutional Remedy....



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 08:04 PM
link   
reply to post by PsychoX42
 


Go hug a tree. Do you listen to the Beatles song" All You Need Is Love" repeatedly and now come to believe it? Violence is here, always has been and always will be. It is all about energy and not oil, OUR individual energy. Someone or group always wants some other person or groups energy. If Canada is soooo great why are they in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as other places with the U.S. If EVERYBODY Loved everybody and no person or group preyed on others that would be lovely, but it ain't so. The Aussies wish they still had their firearms. Just be a Subject of the Commonwealth and be taken care of. defense of your argument via the links you provided is VERY weak. You are a Socialist so just man up and say it.

[edit on 30-7-2010 by ATSROT]



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 08:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by hillbilly4rent
reply to post by Danbones
 

I agree on that Obama had a Chair in the UN Security Council in 09 so how do we know he didnt give his approval to run us through


Off topic, I thought it was against con. law for a pres. to occupy two seats of governing during his term.


Obama chaired a meeting as in he led a debate. And anything like this would have to go through congress. And even if it passed then it would only outlaw large scale arms tranfers to certain rebel groups that commit genocide or use child soldiers. This has nothing to with personal fire arms. Not that it will ever pass in the US or the UN.



new topics

top topics



 
24
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join