reply to post by chemistry
Alas, what you see in those photos are features that have vague 'pyramidal' shapes...naturally occuring.
One should take some time to THINK very carefully, and research the scale of those photos...in other words, take into consideration the height of the
satellite when the photo was taken.
Do you see my point?
Here's a way to compare: Look for photos of the Pyramids of Giza, taken from Earth orbit.
We already know the exact size of those pyramids, and they are undoubtedly artificial.
Now, try to imagine the sheer immensity of those in the
photos taken from Mars orbit.
...and is a thinking person still going to allege that they are artifically constructed?
I did a search for you....here is a link:
Now, looking at that, one might think "Well! There you go, see them!?"
However, when you read more, it is important to know the details of that photo. It was taken from the ISS, so we know the height above the ground
(202 NM).
But, since it was taken by a Human, with a camera...AND a telephoto lens, it
appears that more detail is able to be seen, than would be
possible for a robotic camera, without a telephoto lens, that is orbiting Mars.
Here's a snippet about the photo, from the link above:
Astronaut photograph ISS007-E-12915.was taken August 18, 2003, with a Kodak DCS760 digital camera equipped with an 800 mm lens...
I suggest wariness when presented with such claims, by anonymous blokes on the internet, about "cities" and "other signs of civilization" on Mars,
based on misinterpretations of real satellite photos.....