It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Congress Moves a Step Forward Toward the Eradication of “Libel Tourism”

page: 1

log in


posted on Jul, 29 2010 @ 04:43 PM

By Lisa Piraneo, Director of Government Relations

( I am posting the main points, a selection from the whole)

Tuesday, the House of Representatives passed a modified version of H.R. 2765, the “Securing the Protection of our Enduring and
Established Constitutional Heritage Act,” (aka the “SPEECH Act”)

H.R. 2765 deters individuals from bringing a libel or defamation suit against an American in a country that has less protective free
speech laws. This increasing practice is not used to pursue legitimate
claims of defamation and libel, but to silence journalists,
publishers, authors as well as anyone else who seeks to exercise their
First Amendment right of Free Speech.

ACT! for America ( has a history of aggressively and successfully working to defeat libel tourism and to protect every American’s
constitutional right to Free Speech. We have supported and helped pass
similar legislation at the state level in New York (“Rachel’s Law”), as
well as similar legislation in Florida, Illinois, Utah, Tennessee,
Maryland and California. It was time for the U.S. Congress to address
libel tourism protection at a national level as well.

ACT! for America is supportive of H.R. 2765’s provisions—namely banning enforcement of foreign libel judgments, and allowing authors to
request exoneration in court. However, we endorsed, The Free Speech
Protection Act introduced in the House as H.R. 1304, by Rep. Peter
King, and in the Senate as S. 449, by Sen. Arlen Specter, as we feel it
is stronger legislation.

The Free Speech Protection Act contains not only provisions included in H.R. 2765—namely banning the enforcement of foreign libel
judgments—but it goes a step further: The legislation would also
allow American authors and journalists to sue those foreign plaintiffs
here in the United States—something that we feel will be a strong and
successful deterrent to libel tourism litigation.

The bottom line: Legislation that codifies any of our constitutional rights is critically important, and passage of H.R. 2765
can certainly be categorized as a “score” for us on the constitutional
scoreboard. We remain hopeful, however, that stronger legislation, such
as the King/Specter Free Speech Protection Act, will be addressed and
ultimately passed into law during the next session of Congress.

I feel that this legislation is very important to the protection of American's free speech.

I do think there will be some problems, such as when that American is in another country and writes a story that at the time breaks that countries laws due to free speech being censored, how does the journalist get the info back to America without getting in trouble?

I supposed there are aspects of this I do not understand, but I think if an American is here in this country they should be able to write a story on anything they wish without fear from others.

[edit on 29-7-2010 by JohnPhoenix]

posted on Jul, 29 2010 @ 04:49 PM
Hmmm...sounds like a good thing? I'm sure I don't understand it all either. Only one thing that comes to mind...could there be potention for if American "journalists' to abuse this protection...hide behind it, so to speak? Thanks for posting this

new topics

log in