It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Face on Mars is just a Rocky Mountain [New High Resolution Pictures]

page: 8
15
<< 5  6  7    9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 11:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow
a video I dedicate to NASA




[edit on 30-7-2010 by watchZEITGEISTnow]


ZOMG ANOMALIES!!!




posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 11:41 AM
link   
Funny, we have already seen this image, only in black and white, and with more to see....


The new photo is the same as the portion of the old photo directly to to the left of the new photo.

So why not show the entire picture in color?
files.abovetopsecret.com...






[edit on 30-7-2010 by GuyverUnit I]



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 12:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by misinformational
reply to post by mblahnikluver
 


They're just increasing their market share. Assuming, rather obviously, that with purchasing CS5 one intends to doctor images - One would prefer said doctoring of images to as least apparent as obvious.

I say solid marketing strategy - And seeing as you've heard of this 'feature', I'd say the marketing has been successful as well.


It was all over the internet and news. It's not a secret. Anyone who works in design probably uses it.



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 12:41 PM
link   
According to this video (at the end of the video) the objects on the surface of Mars synchronise with/reflect the layout of the pleiades star group.




posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 12:44 PM
link   
reply to post by cllj7
 


What? Someone did mathematics on this face? You have got to be kidding, we don't have the tools to do mathematics about it. Thats like hard and stuff. This is the trolliest troll thread I have ever seen.



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 12:59 PM
link   
I thought this was pretty funny about what the article off the website stated "This is the closest ever image of the famous outcrop which should, once and for all, scotch the conspiracy theorists who believe that the 'face' is conclusive evidence of intelligent life on Mars.

It just adds more the the whole conspiracy of it....

Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk...



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 01:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by nunya13
 


Here you go.....have a look at this.....


Hoagland Cyclonia Pyramid Maths Analysis By Professor Ralph Greenburg, Dept of Mathematics, University of Washington

Hoagland Cyclonia Mounds Maths Analysis By Professor Ralph Greenburg, Dept of Mathematics, University of Washington

Hoagland Cyclonia Maths Analysis by Phil Plait

Homepage of Professor Ralph Greenburg Dept of Mathematics, University of Washington



Its a shame I'm not a mathematician and I would never understand what that essay is all about. I agree, Hoagland is hokey and no doubt he refused a debate, but without being able to decipher the math involved and showing the work myself, I will never know if there were flaws in it. Can you? Dude, if you can understand all that stuff then I've met my match. Hats off to you.



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 01:20 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 01:24 PM
link   
reply to post by misinformational
 


never heard of HDR ?



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 01:28 PM
link   
reply to post by zaiger
 


You know...I'm just not sure anymore. Reading the bad astronomy version of it, puts it in a perspective I can follow. Way too many possible angles and numbers to crunch, resulting in picking and choosing which connections look good.

I would have to go back and watch what hoagland has to say in his original hypothesis again.



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 01:39 PM
link   
I thought it was not posted yet, but for those interested, is here a interesting very detailed image of the famous so called “Face on Mars”.

www.thehiddenrecords.com...



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 01:46 PM
link   
reply to post by ignorant_ape
 


I hadn't, but Google is my friend...

What does High Dynamic Range Imaging have to do with accepting any image as empirical data? The point of the sum total of all my postings within this thread was simply stating zero conclusions may be made from any image. Is the supposed face at Cydonia an artifact from some civilization? We simply don't have enough data to prove, nor disprove that thesis.

Wikipedia's definition of drawing a scientific conclusion: "To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning."

While any given image - developed via HDR or not - is certainly observable, it is no way empirical. Simply visit the ATS Alien forum to see how easy manipulation of images is... Should NASA wish to present images that had been doctored, you can bet their debunking would be a great deal more difficult.

Other than that, what exactly was your point of inquiring about any knowledge of HDR?



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 01:54 PM
link   
the image is zoomed in so far there's no way to verify this is the mountain in question.

the picture is cut off. I can see what sort of looks like the lips, and the shadow is right, but most of the image is missing. if you have a picture that's zoomed out a little more that would help.








posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 03:08 PM
link   
There is trust required to believe that these pictures are showing what NASA says they are. If you have trust, you believe it. If you dont, you dont.

So how will these new pictures change anything? Either you believed the NASA story before the images, and you will still believe it. Or you didnt, and you still wont believe it.

Seems like someone wants to fuel this meaningless debate all over again. Its meaningless because the pictures are irrelevant. Only your belief of NASA is relevant.

Yep, its the classic pyramid of authority where nobody on a lower level can verify for themselves, and where the people on lower level are expected to provide evidence for their claims (but NASA doesnt). Thats why this scheme works so well for NASA and others high up in society who wants to get away with their lies.



[edit on 30-7-2010 by Copernicus]



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 04:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Copernicus
 


On and on about NASA again??? :shk:

Such a strawman argument....

Do you feel the same way about the ESA???

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:15 PM
link   
I wanted to throw this up on the boad.





posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 05:48 PM
link   
I don't know about you guys but I see.....in that picture

AN OTHER FACE


Or isn't it...?

[edit on 30-7-2010 by zatara]



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 07:05 PM
link   
Face on Mars & The New Discovery




Now get every NASA Pic from a Official NASA website! that Shows the Face of Mars and see for your self!!! hmm interesting The Marker's

here look for your self!!!
nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov...

They even included the markers in the face of mars in 3d photo they made!

apod.nasa.gov...

are the Markers photo shop points ? that NASA forgot to erase out ?



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 08:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by tunist
According to this video (at the end of the video) the objects on the surface of Mars synchronise with/reflect the layout of the pleiades star group.

I've got moles on my bottom that synchronize/reflect the layout of the star group Orion!
Hmmm...There's alien life down there!! Sheeesh!



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 08:28 PM
link   
reply to post by cllj7
 


Looks exactly like a face to me..

i see the nose and eyes and the mouth..

but you have to spin it clockwise ..

at precisely 200 MPH and stand on your head..


but really..what is that a pic of again?

doesn't look anything like the other pics of that area..

Go NASA!! woot!



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 5  6  7    9  10 >>

log in

join