Face on Mars is just a Rocky Mountain [New High Resolution Pictures] , page 10
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 15 times


reply posted on 9-8-2010 @ 11:56 PM by dragnet53
reply to post by sremmos



I am partially trained to have a keen eye since I work on detailing my work. Those two pictures don't look alike at all. So JPL finally got its wish and just deleted the face of mars from its existence. humanity is sad.


reply posted on 30-1-2011 @ 11:51 AM by Zip Monster
When the new 2010 colorized image of the eastern side of the Face (7/28/10) is compared to the highest resolution picture obtained by NASA’s MOC camera in 2001 (Figure 1.B) and the European Space Agency’s 2006 false color image (Figure 1.C) - it becomes quite clear that the eastern facial features are consistent and appear to be permanent structural formations (Figure 1)




Figure 1
Comparison of three views of the eastern feline side of the Face on Mars

A: Detail of MRO HiRISE false color image PSP_003234_2210 (2010)
B: Detail of MOC image E03-00824 (2001)
C: Detail of the ESA false color perspective view (2006)
D: Analytical drawing


Looking at all three images, note the broad forehead and a crown feature is observable in each image. Notice the rectangular, squinting eye, the muzzle and zig-zag shaped mane is present in all three images. Also notice that each image shows evidence of a parted mouth and flailing tongue.

So what prompted the University of Arizona HiRISE team to revisit a three year old image of the Face on Mars and manipulate it by cropping it and colorizing it and then release it as a new image?

Zip Monster



reply posted on 30-1-2011 @ 12:54 PM by DuceizBack
reply to post by Chance321



Who am I going to believe?
A bunch of greatly skilled scientist[nasa]
or a nerd who thinks of conspiracies all day?


I think i'll place my bets with nasa.


reply posted on 1-2-2011 @ 09:52 PM by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by DuceizBack



Nasa why would you trust them? and yet all the time they keep editing and even covering up much of the photos we see when they release the photos to the public.

Have you ever wondered why are there no stars in some of our planets when NASA took the photos?

Not to mention the mars rover photos maybe mars has a blue sky and yet NASA covered it up to make to it seem that mars is a red dusty planet.
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^