Originally posted by Chance321
Do they really think people are going to buy this?? A little photo shopping and call it High Resolution. With NASA's history of blurring photos that we've all seen here on ATS I don't buy this one either.

Do you have evidence that this photo is either a) been tampered with or b) not of what NASA says it to be?

Originally posted by misinformational
Do you have evidence (a) that the photo hasn't been altered or (b) is of what NASA says it is?

Without evidence either way, there cannot be a conclusion.

That conclusion itself is far-off, itself a logical fallacy. The claim is being made that NASA is lying; being there is no evidence of that or even reason to doubt it, we must submit to the null hypothesis, that being that NASA is not lying.

Originally posted by DoomsdayRex

Originally posted by Chance321
Do they really think people are going to buy this?? A little photo shopping and call it High Resolution. With NASA's history of blurring photos that we've all seen here on ATS I don't buy this one either.

Do you have evidence that this photo is either a) been tampered with or b) not of what NASA says it to be?

Nope, no evidence. But think about it, you have a "clear" picture that was in my opinion released by accident showing a clear image of a face. For years NASA's been hounded by people about that one photo, so now all of a sudden we get this new Hi Res photo disproving it. Why now?

Originally posted by Chance321

I'll answer it this way. I don't believe we're the only intelligent life out here. So, yeah, why not? All it would take is a change in the Earths orbit and our world could be a waste land, who's to say that's not what "could've" happened to life on Mars?

I don't think we on Earth are the only intelligent life in the universe -- or even the galaxy...
...HOWEVER, that idea that intelligent life exists elsewhere is a far cry from being evidence that the face on Mars is intelligently built.

True -- there "could have been" alien life on Mars building faces, but you made it sound as if you are positive NASA photoshopped that image to hide the face.

Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People

Originally posted by Chance321

I'll answer it this way. I don't believe we're the only intelligent life out here. So, yeah, why not? All it would take is a change in the Earths orbit and our world could be a waste land, who's to say that's not what "could've" happened to life on Mars?

I don't think we on Earth are the only intelligent life in the universe -- or even the galaxy...
...HOWEVER, that idea that intelligent life exists elsewhere is a far cry from being evidence that the face on Mars is intelligently built.

True -- there "could have been" alien life on Mars building faces, but you made it sound as if you are positive NASA photoshopped that image to hide the face.

I'm saying I don't fully trust them. Okey, try this approach. We have Mount Rushmore, right? Not quite the same scale ofcourse. What if that was their version of Mt. Rushmore?

Maybe or maybe not... that the Cydonia face is really a mountain but...a Holy Martian Mountain dedicate to "Alalu" the Hero.
And maybe or maybe not... that this is the real perspective of the face of Alalu the Outcast King.

A portrait


Like this



Who knows.... if The Cydonia face is a holy portrait upon the mountain consumed by the Time or destroyed by the wars or photoshopped by NASA!. Who knows...