The dead sea: Global warming blamed for 40 per cent decline in the ocean's phytoplankton, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 29-7-2010 @ 09:32 AM by ModernAcademia

The dead sea: Global warming blamed for 40 per cent decline in the ocean's phytoplankton


www.independent.co.uk
The microscopic plants that support all life in the oceans are dying off at a dramatic rate, according to a study that has documented for the first time a disturbing and unprecedented change at the base of the marine food web.

Scientists have discovered that the phytoplankton of the oceans has declined by about 40 per cent over the past century
They believe the change is linked with rising sea temperatures and global warming.

"If this holds up, something really serious is underway and has
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
en.wikipedia.org
www.elnino.noaa.gov
www.cpc.noaa.gov


reply posted on 29-7-2010 @ 10:26 AM by mordant1
reply to post by zroth



You may not be, but I am a scientist but even if I werent I do know that pollution of the seas is a bad thing in general and should stop, simply out of good conservative stewardship, but the global warming profiteers/promoters only solution and desire is to profitably sell CO2 licenses to polluters who transfer the costs to the products that they produce and purchased by the peeps. The real pollutants ie nitrogen and sulfer gases are not being addressed in any of their scenarios because they need to demonize CO2 which is not a functional greenhouse gas, rather, it's beneficial in larger amounts for plant growth. CO2 could rise by a factor of 10 and have no detrimental effect.


reply posted on 29-7-2010 @ 10:37 AM by Gorman91
reply to post by ModernAcademia



If 40% of phytoplankton have gone missing. Then why hasn't a quarter of the oxygen content of Earth gone with them?

news.nationalgeographic.com...

Now being a Christian, this is not surprising. It is the beginning of the death of all sea creatures. But being scientific, I can't help but question the legitimacy of this article, seeing as I'm still breathing. So either one or the other is wrong, Or something else has filled in the gap.

[edit on 29-7-2010 by Gorman91]


reply posted on 29-7-2010 @ 12:09 PM by rhinoceros
reply to post by Maxmars


Right, right. Have a look at the original article (don't bother if you don't know statistics well). Their statistics are a lot more than "when x increases, y decreases".

[edit on 29-7-2010 by rhinoceros]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 3 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 5 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 4 days ago with 49 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 13 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 8 hours ago, 52 replies