Details of 100m Facebook users collected and published, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 26 times
Topic started on 28-7-2010 @ 04:09 PM by Extralien

Details of 100m Facebook users collected and published


www.bbc.co.uk
Personal details of 100m Facebook users have been harvested and published on the net by a security consultant.

Ron Bowles used a piece of code to scan Facebook profiles, collecting data not hidden by the user's privacy settings.

The list, which has been shared as a downloadable file, contains the URL of every searchable Facebook user's profile, their name and unique ID.

On the Pirate Bay, the world's biggest file-sharing website, the list was being distributed and downloaded by more than 1,000 users.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 28-7-2010 @ 04:09 PM by Extralien
This is interesting.

Facebook say that this info is already in the public domain, but it seems the issue is a bit more 'in-depth' than that.

And some of the comments that 'Facebook' have made about this info is, in itself, a little odd when you read between the lines;
In a statement to BBC News, Facebook said that the information in the list was already freely available online.

"People who use Facebook own their information and have the right to share only what they want, with whom they want, and when they want," the statement read.

And this is the point.. with whom and when... not by some research group gathering data as they so please.

and here is the argument against Facebook;
"Facebook should have anticipated this attack and put measures in place to prevent it," he said

"It is inconceivable that a firm with hundreds of engineers couldn't have imagined a trawl of this magnitude and there's an argument to be heard that Facebook have acted with negligence, he added.

Mr Davies said that the trawl of data fed into "the confusion of the privacy settings". "This highlights the argument for a higher level of privacy and proves the case for default nondisclosure," he said.

"There are going to be a lot of angry and concerned people right now who be wondering who has their data and what they should do."


And too right too... I am glad I am not on Facebook, or anything similar.. I get quite few friends ending me "reminders" to join up, but I just keep deleting the requests.. no matter how good a friend they, or I, are.

IMO, my privacy is my own and I will choose what to do with it. Facebook has been made into something that 'appears' to be a must-have.. If you're not on it, you're not connected.. It gives this impression, yet this info collected just goes to show how potentially damaging this is to everyones privacy..

i dread to think how much info has been collected by governments and the like.



www.bbc.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)



mod edit: to change quote tags to ex tags


MOD NOTE: Posting work written by others

[edit on Wed Jul 28 2010 by DontTreadOnMe]


reply posted on 28-7-2010 @ 04:49 PM by zroth
reply to post by Extralien




This will undoubtedly create a huge uprising.

BP Spill = doesn't matter to Americans.
Social Security = doesn't matter to Americans.
Civil liberties = doesn't matter to Americans.
Human rights = doesn't matter to Americans.

Facebook privacy = OMG, President Obama…YOU HAVE TO DO SOMETHING!!!

Nothing is more important than privacy on a totally free service where no one ever lifted a finger to build the site in the first place.


reply posted on 28-7-2010 @ 04:57 PM by Extralien
reply to post by RMFX1



Thank you very much for doing so.

It will be interesting to see what you will find. I sincerely hope you and your partners details are not there.

I wont download it on the principle of helping to keep such info minimised. I know I am just one out of many, but I am one less who does not have, or need, this data.


reply posted on 28-7-2010 @ 05:10 PM by RMFX1
reply to post by Extralien



I've got it. It weighs in at over 2 gigs. I'm going to have a quick look at it now before bed. I'll report back.

EDIT: OK, these are the files contained in the packed rar file. They are all .txt files only so no photos or anything like that. Just a list of names it seems:

Filename Description
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
facebook.rb The script used to generate these files (v1)
facebook.nse The script that will be used for the second pass (v2)
facebook-urls The full URLs to every profile
facebook-names-original All names, including duplicates
facebook-names-unique All names, no duplicates
facebook-names-withcount All names, no duplicates but with a count
facebook-firstnames-withcount All first names (with count)
facebook-lastnames-withcount All last names (with count)
facebook-f.last-withcount All first initial last name (with count)
facebook-first.l-withcount All first name last initial (with count)


I've extracted the unique file to have a look at that but it's taking an age to open up for some reason. I'll probably have to check it tomorrow as I'm ready for bed.



EDIT again: The unique file just opened up. It's only a list of names. Nothing more. It seems like a bit of a storm in a teacup. I'll check the file with the URL's tomorrow but I'm guessing that it's nothing more than a list of names with links to their facebook page.

[edit on 28-7-2010 by RMFX1]


reply posted on 28-7-2010 @ 05:32 PM by crazydaisy
reply to post by RMFX1



I too hope its just names! I was going to join a new site today and decided not to as the information required for registration was not information that I wanted to give out. Why do they require street addresses and telephone numbers anyway. And blah blah I know they say they don't give it out but if someone wants it they can get it. A user name and email address should be enough. I belong to Facebook only because my daughter ask me to join because the family gathers there. Too late now to delete my account.



reply posted on 28-7-2010 @ 05:49 PM by LadySkadi
Have any of you heard of this site: BugMeNot

BugMeNot.com was created as a mechanism to quickly bypass the login of web sites that require compulsory registration and/or the collection of personal/demographic information (such as the New York Times).


Wonder if it does what it says it does?
Thoughts?


reply posted on 28-7-2010 @ 05:55 PM by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by LadySkadi
Have any of you heard of this site:
BugMeNot

BugMeNot.com was created as a mechanism to quickly bypass the login of web sites that require compulsory registration and/or the collection of personal/demographic information (such as the New York Times).


Wonder if it does what it says it does?
Thoughts?
Well it only took 5 seconds to try it with facebook. I tried it and got the message:

This site has been barred from the bugmenot system.
So it doesn't work with Facebook.


reply posted on 28-7-2010 @ 06:22 PM by LadySkadi
[edit on 28-7-2010 by LadySkadi]



reply posted on 29-7-2010 @ 02:33 AM by Ian McLean
Not new news. For example, I was reading this paper a few weeks ago (news article):
We used the social network data set studied in [6] for experiments. This data set contains 778M edges and describes personal relationships and group memberships crawled from Facebook, Orkut, Flickr, and LiveJournal.

A correlated association graph has more information than a collection of profile URLs.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 3 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 5 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 4 days ago with 49 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Santorum wants more fracking!!!
  US Political Madness, Posted 13 hours ago, 53 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 8 hours ago, 52 replies