posted on Dec, 24 2010 @ 03:27 PM
Bezmenov says truths, obviously. As did other defected spies. Lunev gives details of what the first strike will be (suitcases). Suvorov is another
source if you are interested why Hitler came to power in Stalin's view, how Stalin would start the war first etc.
However, we should ask ourselves why that information is made public then? Defected spy? Or last warning?
There are other sources that we should not ignore. Including sources who show the other side of the coin. Thus, CIA published officially an assessment
some 12 years ago how Siberia is too large for Russia and should be divided into 6 to satisfy more countries, incl. USA. Then Putin who was just
raised to power (forgot if PM or already president) who offered Russia to enter NATO, was very very angry at that CIA plan. The best way to create an
We should ask the question if there wasn't the period after the Cold War of a relatively peace, then what? If it wasn't Gorbachev's perestroika,
all of that wouldn't be possible, and we would have 60 000 soviet nukes towards 25 000 US, plus 20 years more advanced space based lasers. So I agree
with the observations the ex-spy makes about USA, but don't understand or don't agree with his agenda, or his way out of the situation. Because the
facts in the world are showing an USA that is not as peaceful and democratic, rather a USA that is invading country after country and positioning
missiles next to Russian borders. Well, what are expected the Russians to do? To surrender and disintegrate their country, installing a puppet
government, and giving resource rich Siberia to USA for the right to live on the planet?