Originally posted by indigothefish
this is good news, the bill itself was not going to solve anything anyway
here is my reasoning
as i said in another thread, when you have a bug problem in your house, you don't just get rid of every bug you see on the spot, while that might work for a bug intrusion here and there, when you've got an infestation happening the solution is to call the bug man and lay out a chemical perimeter around your house which will effectively solve the problem
the illegal immigration problem in america is the same, this bill will enable police officers to stop more people based on profiling, which undoubtably will solve more illegal immigrant problems that have ALREADY immigrated here, but as long as we don't finance and focus our attention and intelligence on building up our borders and preventative measures for this problem, it will keep occuring
that is why i think this bill, racist or not, controversial or not, would not have solved our illegal immigrant probelm anyhow
all this bill was going to do was introduce into our mentality that it's ok for police and officials to question you based on how you look, or for no reason at all, ultimately these are philosophies outlined in 1984 and includes a growth of 'big brother's' powers
HOWEVER
i would like to add it is not neccessarily a good thing though, as the federal government is stating that states do not have the right to try and solve 'federal' problems, and the fact that the federal government is intervening within a states rights to govern itself in it's own rights is bad
though, in my personal opinion, the bill was not going to solve anything anyway, this is a testament to our current times
when america was founded, states were given certain rights apon which the government could not federally interfer, but i fear recent years have created the federal governments beleif that if they so choose to they can intervene in any state however they want, legally or not, they think they're the federal government so they get the final say.. which is not what was originally intended in the creation of america
so ultimately my conclusion is this, we avoided a bill that introduced 1984-like proposals, and yet we avoided it by the federal government jaming into our conciousness that it can do whatever it pleases, i don't know which is worse
[edit on 7/28/2010 by indigothefish]
[edit on 7/28/2010 by indigothefish]
I find it funny that you cmopared human psyche to bug psyche lol....your analagy fails at recognizing the obvious difference between how those two very different creatures opperate.
Humans can recognize positive and negative feedback for certain actions and well, bugs cannot. Putting the legal hammer down on illegals will be a negative feedback to their action of coming here illegaly which, If bugs had this same psyche you could in theory stomp the hell out of the bugs in your house causing the others to say "uhhh screw this place, its not worth it".
Your analagy is not practical or even realistic.
There needs to be A LOT of negative reinforcement for illegals to come here. Enough that makes it not worth their time or effort. There should be no positive feedback involved with them staying put as that is what they should naturally do anyway as this is not their country to just waltz in and out of as they please. Just as mexico is not my country to just waltz in and out of as I please.
Possibly some positive feedback for going about immigration the correct way and going through the immigration process legaly. Some kind of benefit to doing things right and practical concequence of going about it illegaly.
In fact I can't even belive this is something that is up for debate or discussion or interpretation its a pretty basic standard cut and dry text book way of enforcing action or inaction. Its done in the penal system, business sector, military, etc


when we started our jobs and saw how lazy SOME "americans" are they think they deserve everything
without doing anything. 