It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by Chance321
The right to vote:
The 15th Amendment gave Blacks the right to vote.
The 19th Amendment gave Women the right to vote.
Neither of these two constitutional amendments give illegals the right to vote, but neither of these two constitutional amendments says that illegals are less than human.
These still are people protected under the Constitution of the United States.
[edit on 7/29/2010 by whatukno]
Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886)
In Yick Wo v. Hopkins, a case involving the rights of Chinese immigrants, the Court ruled that the 14th Amendment's statement, "Nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," applied to all persons "without regard to any differences of race, of color, or of nationality," and to "an alien, who has entered the country, and has become subject in all respects to its jurisdiction, and a part of its population, although alleged to be illegally here." (Kaoru Yamataya v. Fisher, 189 U.S. 86 (1903) )
Wong Wing v. U.S. (1896)
Citing Yick Wo v. Hopkins, the Court, in the case of Wong Wing v. US, further applied the citizenship-blind nature of the Constitution to the 5th and 6th amendments, stating ". . . it must be concluded that all persons within the territory of the United States are entitled to the protection guaranteed by those amendments, and that even aliens shall not be held to answer for a capital or other infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law."
Plyler v. Doe (1982)
In Plyler v. Doe, the Supreme Court struck down a Texas law prohibiting enrollment of illegal aliens in public school. In its decision, the Court held, "The illegal aliens who are plaintiffs in these cases challenging the statute may claim the benefit of the Equal Protection Clause, which provides that no State shall 'deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.' Whatever his status under the immigration laws, an alien is a 'person' in any ordinary sense of that term… The undocumented status of these children vel non does not establish a sufficient rational basis for denying them benefits that the State affords other residents."
Originally posted by neo96
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by butcherguy
Originally posted by butcherguy
If they block the jail, they would be breaking the law. How would the First Amendment be jeopardized by arresting them if they break the law?
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
For one, I doubt they would block the jail, for two, the above amendment to the United States Constitution trumps the law.
As long as they are peaceful, there is nothing that this sheriff can do without seriously violating people's constitutional rights.
you know damn well that means LEGAL US CITIZENS
the writers of the constitution had no clue of what immigrations problems would become.
that constitution is in fact the document that is suppose to protect her citizens and if your illegal YOU ARE NOT A CITIZEN.
anyone who breaks the law needs to goto jail.
this reminds me of those cops who tried to arrest those 80 year old lady teapartiers.
this is a messed up situation no matter how you look at it.
this also reminds of bernie maddov- the rich and he was crucified he broke the law and he was punished.(maddov stole billions)
illegals are stealing billions upon billions everysingle day with the healthcare and social security that YOU pay for.
illegals break the law everyday and noone from the left gives a flying f.
THE LAW IS THE LAW NO MATTER WHAT IT IS and it is the rule of the land thus it should be enforced.
the liberal mindsets yeah we like laws but only when it benefits them.
You beat me to it there buddy.
I'm not even a US citizen and I can see those amendments do not cover illegals!
[edit on 28-7-2010 by neo96]
Originally posted by Chance321
reply to post by Chance321
I do not see anything in there that grants illegal alieans the same rights. The Bill of Rights is for the American citizens. www.archives.gov...
This too also from the same site: Article IV section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence
Does that sound the government is doing their job?
[edit on 29-7-2010 by Chance321]
Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886)
In Yick Wo v. Hopkins, a case involving the rights of Chinese immigrants, the Court ruled that the 14th Amendment's statement, "Nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," applied to all persons "without regard to any differences of race, of color, or of nationality," and to "an alien, who has entered the country, and has become subject in all respects to its jurisdiction, and a part of its population, although alleged to be illegally here." (Kaoru Yamataya v. Fisher, 189 U.S. 86 (1903) )
Wong Wing v. U.S. (1896)
Citing Yick Wo v. Hopkins, the Court, in the case of Wong Wing v. US, further applied the citizenship-blind nature of the Constitution to the 5th and 6th amendments, stating ". . . it must be concluded that all persons within the territory of the United States are entitled to the protection guaranteed by those amendments, and that even aliens shall not be held to answer for a capital or other infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law."
Plyler v. Doe (1982)
In Plyler v. Doe, the Supreme Court struck down a Texas law prohibiting enrollment of illegal aliens in public school. In its decision, the Court held, "The illegal aliens who are plaintiffs in these cases challenging the statute may claim the benefit of the Equal Protection Clause, which provides that no State shall 'deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.' Whatever his status under the immigration laws, an alien is a 'person' in any ordinary sense of that term… The undocumented status of these children vel non does not establish a sufficient rational basis for denying them benefits that the State affords other residents."
PHOENIX (AP) — Three people have been arrested as hundreds of protesters rally against Arizona's new immigration law despite a federal judge's last-minute decision to block the most controversial parts of the measure.
Originally posted by lostinspace
reply to post by Blanca Rose
Just a moment ago on CNN it showed about 12 people getting arrested. The protesters get in a line in front of the riot police and the police talk to them and take their pictures and then take them a way with their hands tied. The first group was a line of 5 people. The second group was a line of 7 people. If this process keeps going there are going to be hundreds of arrests.