It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Virginia UFO sighting, July 25, 2010 all 4 parts

page: 3
41
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 03:43 PM
link   
LOVE seeing all these types of videos, so thanks for sharing.

Would like the Canadian filmmaker to come forward with the footage shot by an airline pilot. You can see the aliens through the windows of the UFO. This was shot many years ago and the pilot turned the footage over to the producer of a Canadian TV show. He was subsequently threatened that if he ever showed the footage they would kidnap his young son. The producer has not yet show the footage. Now 20 + years later -
Hey, if you're out there Mr. Producer, now may be the time to bring it forward. The world is waiting.




posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 03:48 PM
link   
I also live in Virginia I go out about 3-4 nights a week to look out through my telescope and just plane watch for anything interesting or un-usual. One night me and a few friends caught something similar to this but that was many years ago when I was in high school had no camera or nothing but we all remember it well. It was crazy and I've never seen anything like it again. I am not in the mountains but would like to know around where your seeing these objects ... thanks in advance.



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 04:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
"Oh, I've gotta charge this up. I'm out of juice."

Um. When your battery goes dead you don't get audio or video.


Perhaps he was referring to the battery indicator and obviously wasn't 100% out of juice yet when he said that. But you knew that.



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 04:38 PM
link   
Lights in sky at NIGHT = Nothing verifiable or deniable.

Non-event. Sorry.



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 04:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Airborne880
 


Hello Airborne,
Obviously there are the usual concerns here - shaking video, no points of reference, teeny tiny nighttime lights, and these are covered by others here. Some people simply won't even give the time of day (or night!) to such video, primarily because there are so many videos posted that are simply aircraft, flares, lanterns or hoaxes...

Is it possible that you have something better quality, we are looking at YouTube Video - you can of course post your video directly onto ATS. Others here are very willing to analyze video etc.

Do you have exact dates/times.

And - of course - if you are lucky enough to encounter again - please - as well as a Tripod or fixed mounting, please can you capture reference items - such as buildings and trees in the frame or slowly move to capture the surroundings, don't be too tempted to zoom all over the place, don't use digital zoom, use analogue zoom.

And - of course - if you have $$$ and interest - purchase nighttime equipment so as to capture better quality images etc.

Others here will tear it all up, I am relatively impressed but there are no frames of reference... ie is this actually in the sky!

TTFN
askbaby



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 04:51 PM
link   
reply to post by k3rm1t
 


Easily made in 3d or even 2d editors so I have no freaking idea.



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 04:59 PM
link   
Welcome to the club Airborne,

I for one believe you because I have witnessed a similar event with friends in '97. Here at ATS you will find a rainbow of characters ranging from the gullible to the hard core skeptic debunker class. Some are polite, and some not so polite with nothing to add but to der

ail your thread. Pay no attention.

Coming here and offering your first hand experience and answers to those who request them is a big plus for this crowd and you may have already earned points with some skeptics. You will find also that a method used to distract others reading this forum is done by dissecting every word you say to find flaws, inaccuracy, and contradictions. Be wary. When that doesn't work they may try to discredit you by finding other posts, youtube vids etc or guilty parties associated with you.

Other tactics will be finding alternate answers for your sighting which would seem more plausible to the skeptic. Like swamp gas, chinese lanterns or yacht windows. (long story)



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 04:59 PM
link   
Wow, I didn't realise you have "to will them to change shape". I had always assumed the little green men did the shape change on their own without our help.

Golly. So, if people can "will it" to change shape, why not "will it" to come closer or even "will it" to land so we could shake hands or paws or flippers or whatever they have to shake.

Gotta remember that it is important to "will it" so it will be so next time.

.
.
.


[edit on 27-7-2010 by romanmel]



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 05:04 PM
link   
I will add this to the discussion .This person came here to share with everyone the experiences they are having and some ,maybe more then some are going to find away to attack this persons video.

Why should someone come here from posting there video on Youtube only to be attacked by the Skeptics who will never ever believe that these things are real.
There excuse as always its lights from a car ,plane ,Blimp anything but what it is that has been video taped.

How can we get to understand this if we already believe its not real in the first place.

Thats why I perfer not to share my thoughts much here because there is a army of really skeptical people just waiting to come up with a logical explanation for everything and not everything in the skies above can be explained away .
Thats all I will say .
Now the Skeptical ones can continue with telling this person what they were seeing and that it was not a UFO.


[edit on 27-7-2010 by wesufmcosmic]



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 05:09 PM
link   
It sounds like bad acting to me. The guy filming just gives the impression of trying too hard and does not seem sincere to me.



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 05:14 PM
link   
reply to post by wesufmcosmic
 


You said, "...there is a army of really skeptical people just waiting to come up with a logical explanation for everything "

What would you prefer? An Army of really gullable people ready to accept anything thrown at them? I was born just before the Roswell, NM incident in 1947 and am still awaiting some type of proof of extraterestrial visitation.



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 05:15 PM
link   
first of all, alot of you need to listen to what they are saying.
they said in another location 150 miles away and they didnt have their camra at the time.
sweet video, wish it was more clear tho
why are these types of videos never clear



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 05:18 PM
link   
I generally consider myself to have a good gut instinct with these things.

This video is legit. They are telling the truth.

The attitudes and disposition of the people seems perfectly reasonable.

I don't see anything wrong with this video.

The people claiming they see something wrong with it, every point you listed was PURELY your SUBJECTIVE OPINION.

I really don't see anything wrong with this video, or the storyline behind it. To me it all seems to add up.

Thanks for sharing. I think theres a 95% chance this video is legit.



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 05:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint
...the witness videos lead me to believe
they are lying when he said they saw it
5 nights in a row in another location and
didn't try to film any of it ???


Yeah. It is becoming so infuriating, that I don't even bother searching these sightings.
What purpose does it serve anyone to lie about something so important?



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 05:21 PM
link   

This still-frame looks *exactly* like the daytime UFO I saw on June 20, 2009. I shot some video but without a zoom lens I was unable to capture the details of the object I saw. At the time, I described the configuration of lights as appearing like a "double cross" -- but this image really pins-down the way it appeared to me while it approached. It's exciting to see something so similar to my own sighting captured by others. I'll be scrutinizing these videos very closely in the near future.

>>edit to fix picture

[edit on 27-7-2010 by zerotensor]



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 05:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Lights in sky at NIGHT = Nothing verifiable or deniable.

Non-event. Sorry.


No, these were lights in the trees.

[edit on 27-7-2010 by FlySolo]



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 05:31 PM
link   
First off Airborne , its good of you to provide input to this thread. I find the clips and explanation very interesting as I believe I expierienced something very similar.

Secondly, I notice you getting upset with some comments. If you don't like the comments my advice is just ignore them. You don't have to respond. Believe me there is plently of people in here that if they think your easily upset will gladly attack. Some very immature people.

Finally my own judgement on the films is probably not one you would like. I hope that if this is a genuine expierience for you and your family that you enjoy it. But I felt that this looked scripted. My intention is not to offend you but the all of the dialouge came across as scripted. Including the mistake with the zoom lense. Also you guys looked like you have been in front of cameras a lot. To me it looked like it took inspiration from the likes of the blair witch project and cloverfield.

Again don't take offence. I'm just giving my opinion , thats what we do here.

Best of luck.



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 05:32 PM
link   
What's with the wise a**es on this site who take it so personally if this was a hoax or not? What's the purpose of acting like a jerk and making juvenile irrelevant comments just because you're skeptical? I think these pea brained pseudo-debunkers need more attention than a person who was actually hoaxing such a stunt.

The sighting and the witness testimony appears credible. Still waiting for that science expert to come on here and say it was a helicopters flying in formation.


[edit on 27-7-2010 by SphinxMontreal]



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 05:39 PM
link   
"My intention is not to offend you but the all of the dialouge came across as scripted. Including the mistake with the zoom lense."

What would be the purpose of scripting the mistake with the zoom lens? What would be the purpose of scripting any of this, since the guy has not come forward with his real name to claim his glory?

"Also you guys looked like you have been in front of cameras a lot."

What does a guy look like when he has been in front of cameras a lot? Do you recognize these guys as being professional actors, since these are people who have been in front of cameras a lot?

"To me it looked like it took inspiration from the likes of the blair witch project and cloverfield."

To me, it looks like you've been watching too many movies, which are not a very good frame of reference when you are trying to distinguish between fantasy and reality.



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 05:46 PM
link   
reply to post by SphinxMontreal
 


I know a lot of people who use video cameras all the time. Personally I can't stand them. I know people who are obsessed with them. They all think they are steven speilberg.

None of their work is even close to looking or sounding like this. None of it. THis is not oscar material but it don't look like something my Uncle or Dad would come up with either.

I am only giving my opinion on it. Your entitled to yours too.

By the way. I don't watch movies.




top topics



 
41
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join