H.R. 5741: Mandatory 2 year Service to Federal Government, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 112 times


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 10:59 PM by ohioriver
Originally posted by g146541
reply to
post by ohioriver



That pertains to punishment for crimes,
Not a bad luck lottery.
Good point however, if they cannot do this to a criminal then why can they do it to a free man or woman?


It does not mean that. It means no one can force you to do anything that you don't want to do, except if you are convicted of a crime.


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 11:00 PM by BubbaJoe
reply to post by g146541



No and you make a very important point. I just had a friend in Iraq make a bad decision, that seemed good at the time, have to worry about the consequences of his decision. He was cleared, however in his mind, he is always going to question that decision. All I have is his side of the story, however I have never known him to embellish or cover up anything, he was pretty shook up.

The military is not perfect in any way shape or form, however, I do believe that basic training/boot camp would do everyone some good, except maybe me at 50, it is going to mess me up bad, LOL, too many body parts that don't work so well any more.



reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 11:02 PM by ohioriver
Originally posted by BubbaJoe
reply to
post by ohioriver



Seems like when the "Bill of Rights" were written, slavery, at least of African Americans was still allowed. But then again, it has been about 30 years since I read my American History.



Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Nowhere in there does it mention race. Indentured servants and slaves were many different races,not just black.


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 11:02 PM by eNumbra
Originally posted by brilab45
reply to
post by eNumbra



It gives incentive. Yes you are right. Star.


Shouldn't need an incentive to fight for liberty. But then we don't fight for liberty much anymore do we?


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 11:07 PM by BubbaJoe
reply to post by Redwookieaz



I do not totally disagree with you, but money and/or power has been what every war in history has been fought over. I do not buy into all of the conspiracies, however, I do believe that someone is pulling some strings. That being said, I do not see doom and gloom, or a massive gov't conspiracy in everything that happens, and not saying that you do. I sometimes just think, to quote Forrest Gump "Sh*t Happens"


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 11:12 PM by brilab45
Originally posted by eNumbra
Originally posted by brilab45
reply to
post by eNumbra



It gives incentive. Yes you are right. Star.


Shouldn't need an incentive to fight for liberty. But then we don't fight for liberty much anymore do we?


You are right again about fighting for liberty. However, there are many folks out there doing it politically. One day we may have to do it revolution style. We as humans are being marginalized by the powers that be (the upper 1% crustaceans). How much do you think we are going take?

We have much at stake right now in the world. Time to speak up and take a position and support those that back our beliefs. Ron Paul for example.

Your questions are legitimate and worthy. But I believe you and I are from different time periods. I'm in my forties (have seen much politico) and I believe you are younger. Nothing wrong with that at all. Young people tend to be a bit sharper. But old people tend to remember the past.


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 11:13 PM by BubbaJoe
Originally posted by ohioriver
Originally posted by BubbaJoe
reply to
post by ohioriver



Seems like when the "Bill of Rights" were written, slavery, at least of African Americans was still allowed. But then again, it has been about 30 years since I read my American History.



Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Nowhere in there does it mention race. Indentured servants and slaves were many different races,not just black.


I am not sure what "Bill of Rights" you are referring to, however, the first amendment has to do with freedom of speech, press, and religion, doesn't mention slavery or servitude at all. However if you are speaking of Section 1 of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, you are quoting section 1 correctly. However this was not passed until 1865, and not considered to be part of the "Bill of Rights"


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 11:16 PM by Redwookieaz
reply to post by BubbaJoe



Well than surely you could see why it would be a good thing if people refused to serve in their self serving military? Again I understand the need for a defense force at home. Perhaps of reservists but folks that think that the US military is out "fighting for our liberty" are blind to the true nature of the world around them.


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 11:24 PM by BubbaJoe
reply to post by Redwookieaz



Especially in the two wars we are involved in now, I don't agree with them, just looking back I don't agree with Viet Nam or several others before 2000. I don't think we are far apart, might just be semantics or verbage that is keeping us apart. One of the things that I strive to do, as I think the 70 percent that lean one way or the other is a lot more powerful than the 15 percent on the fringe of each side.


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 11:25 PM by ohioriver
Originally posted by BubbaJoe
Originally posted by ohioriver
Originally posted by BubbaJoe
reply to
post by ohioriver



Seems like when the "Bill of Rights" were written, slavery, at least of African Americans was still allowed. But then again, it has been about 30 years since I read my American History.



Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Nowhere in there does it mention race. Indentured servants and slaves were many different races,not just black.


I am not sure what "Bill of Rights" you are referring to, however, the first amendment has to do with freedom of speech, press, and religion, doesn't mention slavery or servitude at all. However if you are speaking of Section 1 of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, you are quoting section 1 correctly. However this was not passed until 1865, and not considered to be part of the "Bill of Rights"


That is all you took away from my post? The Constitution doesn't stop at the 10th amendment. The Bill of Rights are the first 10 Amendments, but does not stop there.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul is NOT dropping out, the Mainstream Media is LYING.
  Posted 13 days ago with 111 member flags
Report: Romney Will Be Disqualified From Race Due To Fraud
  Posted 17 days ago with 105 member flags
Evidence of Vote Flipping in GOP Primary Elections
  Posted 5 days ago with 88 member flags
Soldiers and Citizens alike, this is a must see.
  Posted 18 days ago with 69 member flags
Fox News Analyst: First American to shoot down drone will be a hero
  Posted 12 days ago with 68 member flags
US Military you are not fighting for your country
  Posted 19 days ago with 64 member flags