NASA's Deep Space Camera Locates Host of 'Earths', page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 81 times


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 01:03 AM by knightsofcydonia
reply to post by RockCreekMan



timing is everything, our government tells us what they want us to know, when they want us to know about it. maybe NASA is suddenly becoming legitimized to soften us up and prime us for whats to come.



reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 01:03 AM by RockCreekMan
reply to post by YouCanCallMeKM



Yep, great point. Thanks for the reply. Gives me something to think about.


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 01:25 AM by TV_Nation
I posted this info almost a month ago and to be honest most of the information is misleading. I wonder why fox was so far behind on reporting this.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

To say that these planets are earth like is taking a huge shot in the dark. None of this information has been confirmed as to weather or not any of these planets can even sustain life and it has not been confirmed if these finds are even planets at all.

Here is a quote from Yeti101 that puts it in a little better perspective.

they have 700+ candidates but around 50% will be false positives. Also they wont be "earth-like", all these planets so far will be very close to their stars. Maximum 15 day orbit and many will be alot bigger than earth. Although if some are around M stars that might put them in the HZ of the star they will be very diffirent from earth. (tidally locked etc)


It's going to be a waiting game to get real evidence of earth like planets. I'm willing to bet it will be a few more years before there is solid evidence of such planets and that is if they even decide to tell us of such places existing.


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 01:41 AM by THE_PROFESSIONAL
en.wikipedia.org...

This article describes how unlikely we humans are in this universe. And this is just from a geological, paleontological, astronomical perspective. It doesn't even take into account chemistry or physics.


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 02:03 AM by Perseus Apex
reply to post by Portugoal



People always ask me to Karaoke the song for some reason.
I suppose it's Serendipity in Motion.....without the holograph of course.
It's Fox msm, they may-be on to something, hopefully, for some 'Good' Reason.


[edit on 26-7-2010 by Perseus Apex]


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 02:04 AM by Spinotoror
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
en.wikipedia.org...

This article describes how unlikely we humans are in this universe. And this is just from a geological, paleontological, astronomical perspective. It doesn't even take into account chemistry or physics.


I'm sorry but it describes how allegedly unlikely we are. It is a hypothesis, not a law. That word tells a lot.



reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 02:13 AM by Perseus Apex
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL



Give me a call.
You have my number.
If not, your boss does.
I'd like to talk.
You?


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 02:24 AM by AntiNWO
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
en.wikipedia.org...

This article describes how unlikely we humans are in this universe. And this is just from a geological, paleontological, astronomical perspective. It doesn't even take into account chemistry or physics.


If Wikipedia was around in the time of Galileo it would have described how unlikely it is that the Earth is not the center of the universe.

Is line 2 really necessary here?


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 03:27 AM by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Originally posted by Spinotoror
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
en.wikipedia.org...

This article describes how unlikely we humans are in this universe. And this is just from a geological, paleontological, astronomical perspective. It doesn't even take into account chemistry or physics.


I'm sorry but it describes how allegedly unlikely we are. It is a hypothesis, not a law. That word tells a lot.


This hypothesis is actually more valid than the ones that call for other alien beings as we can actually see the results in the rare earth hypothesis and has yet to be disproven.

Therefore since it is disproven, it is stronger than the aliens hypothesis, which has no evidence of the tiniest amount. Are you going to believe an earth full of evidence or some UFO fanatics ramblings


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 03:29 AM by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Originally posted by AntiNWO
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
en.wikipedia.org...

This article describes how unlikely we humans are in this universe. And this is just from a geological, paleontological, astronomical perspective. It doesn't even take into account chemistry or physics.


If Wikipedia was around in the time of Galileo it would have described how unlikely it is that the Earth is not the center of the universe.

Is line 2 really necessary here?


I never mentioned that the earth is the center of the universe. All evidence is pointing to the fact that there is no intelligent life out there.


reply posted on 26-7-2010 @ 03:32 AM by Burgo
Originally posted by Portugoal


This still doesn't mean any aliens

www.foxnews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



lol if humans are the most intelligent life then god help the universe!!!
my god humans dont even show respect to the life on this planet with their unethical animal testing crap, fur farms etc
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags