Revelation; The Beast- 666, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 13-1-2011 @ 03:51 AM by DISRAELI
reply to post by catwhoknowsplusone


Sorry to hear that Cat died.
Only eight lives left- better take care of them.


reply posted on 13-1-2011 @ 05:00 AM by Student X
reply to post by DISRAELI



Thanks for another simplistic exoteric take on things. It cleanly ignores the esoteric undercurrents that weave throughout world religion and myth, including of course the Bible. As usual. But who knows, maybe in the end it will turn out that the myopic exoteric fundamentalist simpletons are right and all the esoteric mystic wise-men of the ages are wrong. I'm sure that would make you happy.
edit on 13-1-2011 by Student X because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 13-1-2011 @ 05:20 AM by DISRAELI
reply to post by Student X


You complained, once, because I suggested that your attitude towards the non-esoterics amongst us was contemptuous.
I rest my case- the description was valid.


reply posted on 13-1-2011 @ 05:22 AM by Student X
reply to post by DISRAELI



I prefer to think of my words as a sharp rebuke of a foolish and stubborn brother. Underneath such an exchange is love.
edit on 13-1-2011 by Student X because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 13-1-2011 @ 05:24 AM by DISRAELI
reply to post by Student X


I prefer to think of "simpleton" as an expression of contempt.
You showed your colours a long time ago.


reply posted on 13-1-2011 @ 05:30 AM by Student X
reply to post by DISRAELI



Your entire case now rests on your empathic perceptions of me! If you are wrong about your allegations of contempt, then your exegesis is wrong too.


reply posted on 13-1-2011 @ 05:34 AM by DISRAELI
reply to post by Student X


Not so.
The statement that "you are contemptuous" is the case which is being rested on your expressions of contempt.
If I am wrong about your contempt, the only logical consequence is that I am wrong about your contempt.
You always were good at deliberately twisting logic.





edit on 13-1-2011 by DISRAELI because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 13-1-2011 @ 05:39 AM by Student X
reply to post by DISRAELI



Well then, in that case maybe you shouldn't worry so much about your knee-jerk empathic perceptions and go learn about the comparative way, my foolish stubborn brother. Start with comparative mythology. Mix in comparative religion and last but not least comparative mysticism. After a few years of hard study you might be ready to grok the meaning of the esoteric currents and fit them into your exegesis.


reply posted on 13-1-2011 @ 05:42 AM by DISRAELI
reply to post by Student X


Not interested.
If you want to follow that course, go ahead and do it.
A few months later, you will probably be believing in something else.
A few months after that, in a fourth theory.


reply posted on 27-9-2011 @ 04:23 AM by DISRAELI
reply to post by IJUSTAM


The manuscript evidence is ambiguous, so you should not speak with such absolute certainty.
As I was remarking at the end of the OP, if the number is 616 it can still relate to Nero, who may therefore be seen as a model for the later Beast. I refer you to the relevant paragraphs.
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



May 20, 2012, The Great Earthquake may actually happen
  Posted 18 days ago with 20 member flags
May 20th, a NEW PERSPECTIVE at the EARTHQUAKE
  Posted 17 days ago with 10 member flags
Have the Locusts of the Apocalypse been found?
  Posted 6 days ago with 10 member flags
Another Movie Predicts Future: Idiocracy
  Posted 1 days ago with 8 member flags
Dec 23, 2012 marks the date for another major disaster event.
  Posted 4 days ago with 7 member flags
A vision of Jesus and aliens
  Posted 15 days ago with 5 member flags