It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Woman 2, thugs 0 after home invasion

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Jul, 26 2010 @ 01:21 AM
Awesome !!!!

Love seeing stories like this.

posted on Jul, 26 2010 @ 01:18 PM

Originally posted by CosmicEgg
reply to post by Silcone Synapse

But her boyfriend was in the house too.

She recalled with clarity the five shots, including those in which she picked out the attackers even though her boyfriend, black like the attackers, was struggling with them. He had been visiting and came in from the next room after the shots rang out.

I almost choked when the journalist wrote that she shot the right guy, even though her bf was black too. Do "they" all look the same or something? LOL Oh, maybe it was because she should have been hysterical. Surely it counts against her that she was an accurate shot. That means she was waiting for trouble, doesn't it?

Now that's GOOD gun control by God! She probably could have smoked the second f***er if her boyfriend hadn't got in the way.

I can kind of understand, maybe, what I think the reporter meant; but what a FAIL at trying to say it! : )

Being in a situation like that can give you tunnel vision, no matter the light level, and things can get weird as the adrenaline and noise of the weapons fire hit you - it can be hard to resolve faces, and tell friend from foe.

All I can say for her is YOU GO GIRL!

[edit on 26-7-2010 by mydarkpassenger]

posted on Jul, 26 2010 @ 01:35 PM

Originally posted by Darkice19

Originally posted by CosmicEgg
She will be charged with use of excessive force and whatever else they can throw at her. You can't just kill criminals. Criminals are allowed to kill as they commit crimes though, because that makes sense to the courts. Someone has to go to prison, see.

Of course, the state will file the first charges against her, then they'll pay for the surviving criminal to sue her. It's the American way.

Open mouth and insert the foot of ignorance.
She will not be charged with anything. Apparently you don’t know anything about the law in OK.

I bet you speak out allot with no actual knowledge of the subject at hand. You should read the full article and do some research so you don’t make yourself look like a fool next time.

I think you might have to do a little foot from mouth extraction yourself instead: He was being sarcastic against anti-gun nutcases ; )

[edit on 26-7-2010 by mydarkpassenger]

posted on Jul, 26 2010 @ 01:43 PM
Well done!

posted on Jul, 26 2010 @ 02:09 PM
reply to post by CosmicEgg

It was in self defense. One guy had what she thought was a knife at her throat. She had no other choice. Later information shows there was a robbery that left a resident dead 24 hours prior to this one. =]

LOL I love the comments people had for her in the link:

"Fight crime! Shoot back!"

"This story give me a warm and fuzzy feeling inside."



posted on Jul, 26 2010 @ 06:19 PM
reply to post by TrueAmerican

Only two things protect your home: God and Guns.

reply to post by CosmicEgg

It's Oklahoma, she'd be a saint.. only in Liberal states would the Government charge a home owner for murder when fighting off a robber/rapist -- it's clear anti-gun Liberals love and support rape and victimization.

posted on Jul, 26 2010 @ 09:48 PM
Sorry for the hateful sounding post earlier. I was at work and having a bad day.

posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 03:38 AM
Okay everyone, do not give us people that live in liberal states too much crappola.

Someone even mentioned Wisconsin, yes the state may be ran by the liberals but the juries are made up of citizens.

Remember that if you have to deal with any case you know is wrong. Do what you know in your heart is correct and let your fellow citizens decide your fate, do not EVER plea bargain when you are righteous. Plus, have someone give out pamphlets on the law of JURY NULLIFICATION. They are all over the net.

Two jury trials to my credit, two not guilty verdicts. In one we wrote on the paperwork the jury turns in that the district attorney should be censured because he decided to take it to trial.

It took us a whole 30 minutes to decide and write it up. That one was in Fresno California.

Oh, and if someone enters my house, I hope they did some praying.

posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 06:31 PM
@ endisnighe

Yep, take it to a jury and most importantly if you are arrested NEVER talk to police without talking to a lawyer first - exercise your 5th amendment rights.

This is a great video by a law professor and a cop.

posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 06:52 PM
I'd rather be tried by 12 then carried by 6.

Thats why there is always a 40 within reach.

Thank goodness for the castle laws.

posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 08:04 PM
Going to add this video OP. Someone posted it on another and it goes over the REAL statistics of gun use.

Just one example, for all the gun crimes where injuries and death occur, there are 5 times as many incidences where a gun being involved helped the situation, either like what happened here or the criminal fled.

Another is the lies they use on the statistics, like saying that 50% of all crime where a gun is used an acquaintance was involved. An acquaintance can be a criminal that got into a cab and robbed the driver, because they were acquainted due to the business arrangement. Frelling gun control freaks purposefully lying to further there agenda.

I posted this on my home page I liked it so much.

Here is a link to the info regarding crimes going down in Ohio after the CCW was instituted.
Analysis: Violent Crime DOWN since Ohio concealed carry became law

[edit on 7/27/2010 by endisnighe]

new topics

top topics

<< 1   >>

log in