It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
With the naked eye, it is pretty much impossible to determine the altitude of something 30,000-40,000 feet away from you.
Originally posted by fallinstar
there is an airport about 20 miles north of me which they could be a possibility, jus presenting some odd pics ive never seen it this bad
The tiny, close-knit clique of climate scientists who invented and now drive the “global warming” fraud — for fraud is what we now know it to be — tampered with temperature data so assiduously that, on the recent admission of one of them, land temperatures since 1980 have risen twice as fast as ocean temperatures. One of the thousands of emails recently circulated by a whistleblower at the University of East Anglia, where one of the world’s four global-temperature datasets is compiled, reveals that data were altered so as to prevent a recent decline in temperature from showing in the record. In fact, there has been no statistically significant “global warming” for 15 years — and there has been rapid and significant cooling for nine years.
Worse, these arrogant fraudsters — for fraudsters are what we now know them to be — have refused, for years and years and years, to reveal their data and their computer program listings. Now we know why: As a revealing 15,000-line document from the computer division at the Climate Research Unit shows, the programs and data are a hopeless, tangled mess. In effect, the global temperature trends have simply been made up. Unfortunately, the British researchers have been acting closely in league with their U.S. counterparts who compile the other terrestrial temperature dataset — the GISS/NCDC dataset. That dataset too contains numerous biases intended artificially to inflate the natural warming of the 20th century.
Anyone can see what the ‘geoengineering’ proposals were simply by reading the relevant article in Popular Science.
For those for whom that is difficult, the proposals included: 1) underground storage of carbon dioxide, 2) wind scrubbers to filter carbon dioxide from the air, 3) ‘fertilization’ of oceans with iron to encourage growth of plankton, 4) petrification of carbon dioxide, 5) deflection of sunlight from the earth through the use of a giant space mirror ‘spanning 600,000 square miles’.
One point worth mentioning at least in passing is that, apart from the question of how effective these measures would really be, all these highly oil-dependent ‘solutions’ to problems largely caused in the first place by burning fossil fuels, are being prepared for a world that is beginning to run out of oil. (!)
In the case of at least one geoengineering measure, by no means the most ‘outlandish’, namely: ‘Enhancing Clouds to Reflect Sunlight’, a mass of eyewitness evidence for all over the world suggests that, despite official denials, a programme serving some such purpose is not merely a proposal but a reality and has been under implementation on an immensely large scale for at least a decade.
How significant are official denials? Note that the Popular Science article itself admits that the US administration’s words about ‘proof that the planet is warming’ do not match its deeds. If untruthful official denial of global warming is possible, why should untruthful official denial of actually ongoing measures, supposedly to combat global warming, not similarly be possible?
The problem with this topic is that there is too much to explain, not a lack of proof.
Researchers are developing a new type of rocket propellant composed of a frozen mixture of water and "nanoscale aluminum" powder that is considered more ecological than conventional propellants and could be manufactured on the moon and Mars.
i dont care what you or any other conventual minded person has to say on this subject
i know the difference between contrails an chemtrails even though it seems you don't!
Originally posted by DCDAVECLARKE
reply to post by Rohdan
Yea an who are the Debunkers? only other debunkers who all agree with each other, well that holds no water with me! an im not alone....you are been watched very closley we will have our day!
Please check out this video trailer to get a look at the other side of the Global Warming debate. Make no mistake, Global Warming / Climate Change is the rationale behind Global Geo-Engineering. It is the new world jihad, even now being touted, to religious leaders, as a "moral imperative" by Al Gore's minions. CO2 is the new Osama Bin Laden.
We have pleaded with some of you to oppose this massaged and manipulated science called global warming with the axis of evil = CO2. Now it has taken on a life of its own. You know the saying, “who needs enemies with friends like this?” ~ Kudos to the mis-information specialists and their highly decorated and degreed minions.
Do we sound cranky, it is because we are. We realize the full extent of where all the grandstanding, cyber-chatter, digging in of the heels, back stabbing, in house liars, and plain-out inability to work in concert has taken us.
We failed to protect our future with our own stupidity and arrogance which has brought us full circle to where we will pay dearly and monetarily for our own demise.
The big bad enemy CO2 is holding the reigns on this runaway basket to hell. To all the self-satisfied collaborators: thank you so much for sharing your fast held data on global warming / climate change, telling us that you are an expert, the years of study you claimed to have but never shared, obviously because it did not exist. No apology necessary, but thanks.
Originally posted by DCDAVECLARKE
an since the 60s we have been aware of this but what can i say its up to you guys now to fight for the truth!
Originally posted by Point of No Return
reply to post by Phage
So how do you explain why so many people are seeing the sky being hazed up, when they weren't seeing this en masse 15 years ago.
Chemtrails? Need help?
Contrail Chemtrail Research Thread
The Chemtrail Hoax
Are these proof of Chemtrails or Contrails?
Chemtrail believers - I challenge you to debunk contrail science
Contrails: Understanding why they aren’t chemtrails
The Chemtrail Myth
This is not a chemtrail! Atmospheric Phenomenon explained
Why the Chemtrail Conspiracy is Implausible & Meteorologically Inaccurate
The Astounding Effect Of Contrails On Climate
How To Forecast Using Clouds Part 1
Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by fallinstar
A "chemtrail" is a paranoid delusion.
Irrational people keep ignoring scientific evidence & logical thinking, thereby unnecessarily scaring people who are susceptible to such ideas.
There is no such thing as a "chemtrail".