Contrails my ass!

I live in an area with no immediate flight path (western NSW Australia) and I photograph this crap on a daily basis, on top of that my son and I have uncontrollable sneeze attacks whenever we walk outside on days the spraying is going on, and end up with respiratory problems.

Some people will never accept it's a boot up their ass till a surgeon needs to be called in to remove it!

Originally posted by Coming-soon
Contrails my ass!

Whoa, screw the science community, a genius is coming through folks!

Originally posted by Coming-soonI live in an area with no immediate flight path (western NSW Australia) and I photograph this crap on a daily basis, on top of that my son and I have uncontrollable sneeze attacks whenever we walk outside on days the spraying is going on, and end up with respiratory problems.

Firstly, are you a pilot? Do you have an extensive map of Australian flight paths? Secondly, if you live in East Jesus Nowhere, why would they be spraying? They would spray a random part of the desert? Or maybe you know too much and they are trying to kill you!

As for sneezing its called Hayfever. Get some anti-histamines and man up.

Originally posted by Coming-soonSome people will never accept it's a boot up their ass till a surgeon needs to be called in to remove it!

Your attitude is plain (or should that be plane?) ignorant here. You believe some fringe psuedo-science bull#, and therefore you can make a sweeping statement like this? You are one of the lucky few who actually 'get' it. You are so wrong it hurts man. Chemtrails have no basis in hard fact or science. There is no actual evidence for them.

"Chemtrails have no basis in hard fact or science". ... Classic DISINFO. It depends on the energy, persistance, and current attention of those who would dispute you, and their numbers. No broken links in my mind after your words. Clever-sounding nonsense remains nonsense. And a cheerful Good-day to the contrailer relics upon the board.

Originally posted by Northwarden
"Chemtrails have no basis in hard fact or science". ... Classic DISINFO. It depends on the energy, persistance, and current attention of those who would dispute you, and their numbers. No broken links in my mind after your words. Clever-sounding nonsense remains nonsense. And a cheerful Good-day to the contrailer relics upon the board.

Ha "Clever sounding nonsense" - That is just chemmie code for "Do not confuse me with the facts or science, I have my mind already made up"

Classic Disinfo? When why is it that us supposed disinfo agents have to keep correcting the chemmies and the rest of the Insane Cloud Posse on continually making false assertions.

It seems every time a member of the ICP tries to post something about aviation and meteorology, its always wrong. So who are the real disinfo agents?

I'm pretty firmly on the whistleblower side of the fence Firepilot; I don't expect you to have to read back to verify that, so I'll assert it instead. As for the truth of this one, we can't trust your official statistics, so people had to start fresh. The difference between you Con(trail) Artists, and those of us who realize chemicals are spewing from the trails of planes isn't a matter of sanity. It's like jaywalking. Who is going to regulate chemtrails except the odd zeolot with the means. While we all look forward to a lab readout for you someday, THERE ARE NORMAL CONTRAILS ALSO, and some of us are not ignorant to the fact that the majourity of them are "normal", by your own definitions. Please don't continue to insult our intelligence over the existance of geoengineering chemical spray programs which are part of a global UN agenda to "combat global warming". I don't care if you're a pilot sinch age four and can assemble or disassemble every nut and bolt in a hundred varieties of aircraft. It means squat while we are speaking about a media-suppressed, details-classified international government program that You aren't involved with.

You sound ridiculous, if you're levelling that at me. I've been in thread after thread, and others have been in thread after thread, outlining the scope of the situation, the planes proposed for chemspraying and their payload capacities (recall your embarrassment on that thread Weedwacker)? Why in the past we've covered toxins, politics, nwo connectivity and plan furtherances, the scope of the delusion ptb would portray through mass media, the prevalance of paid disinfo to cover up what would be alarming to the masses. They hide behind the fact that there are normal contrails, plain and simple folks. It's not that the science is hard to understand - it's only moderately hard to understand, and takes some time investment, to be an armchair expert on this subject. ANYONE can learn as much as some of these "experts" in a matter of short weeks. What we are dealing with is their misplaced blame for pollutants, and an issue with a very deep underbelly, that the governments of the world prefer not to answer to. The disinfo here thinks, that so long as they deny the root existance of the subject, all talk of geoengineering and the UN, government soft-kill programs in general, are external to this topic. In other words "don't discuss this one little stitch until you show us the proof in the form we demand". Yet by the measure of Our yardstick-which seeks for truth-we Have figured it out. It's in past threads, look it up. So far as your ego-laden comments about solving a controversy for the sake of heroics, or calling peeps sheeps to what ... make myself feel superior? ... it's about time you realized that most of us here are over such babycrap and are linked to the superego drive to do what is right, to speak of what is true whereby the definitions are drawn from your mists, and to outline the importances of higher-minded particulars which are overdue for discussion about the matter at hand. Proofs are already here. Read past threads. They'd be cleaner compositions if it weren't for those agents paid to disseminate the matter on the worlds largest conspiracy site.

Originally posted by Northwarden
I'm pretty firmly on the whistleblower side of the fence Firepilot; I don't expect you to have to read back to verify that, so I'll assert it instead. As for the truth of this one, we can't trust your official statistics, so people had to start fresh. The difference between you Con(trail) Artists, and those of us who realize chemicals are spewing from the trails of planes isn't a matter of sanity. It's like jaywalking. Who is going to regulate chemtrails except the odd zeolot with the means. While we all look forward to a lab readout for you someday, THERE ARE NORMAL CONTRAILS ALSO, and some of us are not ignorant to the fact that the majourity of them are "normal", by your own definitions. Please don't continue to insult our intelligence over the existance of geoengineering chemical spray programs which are part of a global UN agenda to "combat global warming". I don't care if you're a pilot sinch age four and can assemble or disassemble every nut and bolt in a hundred varieties of aircraft. It means squat while we are speaking about a media-suppressed, details-classified international government program that You aren't involved with.

Fanastic post!

Star for you sir.

Thank you for the compliment! <> But as for you Weedwacker, I am presently stuck on a cell phone that allows No paragraph breaks, so please deal with it! The thread will be dug up for you promptly, tomorrow. It got better on the later pages as I recall. I likewise have no cut and paste ability or would deal with your nonsense, effectively, now. In the meantime, one question to occupy your time. What is your Official stance on geoengineering : How much have you studied the matter, what materials have you covered, and what is your assessment of the success of chemtrails as they are proposed? A short synopsis is fine; what are your ideas about the actual idea of creatung artificial cloud cover to combat global warming? Talk to you tomorrow.

[

Contrails disperse behind the plane. Chemtrails stay around for hours, spread out and soon enough clouds form and the sky is overcast. I mean, isn't that just a simple observation?

Says who? A chemtrail website tells you this, so you all just lap it up without question..

I will bite though, tell us why a contrail MUST disperse, and how it can not persist?

Should all clouds disperse right after forming, especially in well below freezing temps?



[edit on 4-8-2010 by firepilot]