It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

over kill chemtrails (pics)

page: 14
13
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 03:29 PM
link   
And there was once a study also about digging canals with nuclear bombs.

So is that evidence then that it secretly happened? I guess I could play the conspiracy card and tell you to prove canals have not been dug with nuclear weapons, since a study proves that it obviously must have happened.

So where are these secret hundreds of rigged aircraft? Do they have their own secret airports? And how come plane spotters and aviation enthisiasts never see them?

I have long challenged chemtrail believers to go to airports and take photos of these airplanes. But they never do, that requires stepping away from the computer and conspiracy websites.





[edit on 25-7-2010 by firepilot]




posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 03:32 PM
link   
reply to post by firepilot
 

Dident yea know? its all Hush, hush!



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 03:37 PM
link   
reply to post by NichirasuKenshin
 





That's a straw man. You yourself acknowledged that skeptics do not claim that nothing has changed.


Again, out of context, it was a response to this:



None of you have ever proven the skies are any different. And it was such a drastic change, then why did the people who notice, only seem to think about it after visiting chemtrail websites?


Seems like you are implying it hasn't changed here.




As for the knowing part. If the knew, they could demonstrate. If they simply believe, they could only appeal. It seems clear to me what's the case here.


How do you demonstrate what the sky looked like on average 10-15 years ago?

People don't have home videos of the sky of enough days to compare, laying around.

Fact remains that there clearly is a phenomenon of people seeing that things are different and strange.

You can say this all has come forth out of chemtrail sites by two guys, but it goes way deeper than that.




Airtraffic has increased dramatically, globalization and all.


Has it increased as much as the phenomenon has increased? Relatively?



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 03:38 PM
link   
reply to post by firepilot
 





And there was once a study also about digging canals with nuclear bombs.


Did people actually witness this, ot think they were witnessing this?

If not, bad analogy.



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 03:43 PM
link   
reply to post by jdub297
 





More planes = more contrails. What's frightening or threatening about that?


Not frightening, but one does wonder what effect the ongoing blocking out of the sun has on nature and climate, and if it's something that is done on pupose.

Is it something I should just accept when I see a beautiful bright sunny sky end up being all hazed, regardless if it's caused by contrails or chemtrails?

It's not caused by natural occuring clouds, I know that much.



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 03:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by firepilot
And there was once a study also about digging canals with nuclear bombs.

So is that evidence then that it secretly happened? I guess I could play the conspiracy card and tell you to prove canals have not been dug with nuclear weapons, since a study proves that it obviously must have happened.

So where are these secret hundreds of rigged aircraft? Do they have their own secret airports? And how come plane spotters and aviation enthisiasts never see them?

I have long challenged chemtrail believers to go to airports and take photos of these airplanes. But they never do, that requires stepping away from the computer and conspiracy websites.





[edit on 25-7-2010 by firepilot]


Every aircraft is "rigged", because it's a fuel additive.

Can you provide proof of the hundreds of thousands if not millions of taxpayer dollars spent to study this technique you mention?



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 03:58 PM
link   
a fuel additive? What additive, do you have proof of it? Or are you speculating that there is an additive and that is your evidence?

If you have evidence that jet fuel is secretly being tampered with, that would be a huge news story and would make you famous. I am pretty sure you do not actually have any evidence other than "Look Boss, de Plane, de Plane!"

A fuel additive is just one of the multitude of individual chemtrail conspiracies. Some say its in the fuel, some say its modified aircraft, some says its airliners, some say its military, some say its space aliens and reptilians flying spaceships...

I mean how we are supposed to know which chemtrail belief is believable?


[edit on 25-7-2010 by firepilot]



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 04:03 PM
link   
reply to post by firepilot
 





some say its space aliens and reptilians flying spaceships...


I've noticed it's always the debunkers that bring these up.



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 04:08 PM
link   
It's been widely discussed by such organizations as the American Geophysical Union:

www.naturaljointmobility.info...



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 04:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Point of No Return
reply to post by firepilot
 





some say its space aliens and reptilians flying spaceships...


I've noticed it's always the debunkers that bring these up.


Well, that IS one of the chemtrail beliefs. And we cant forget the magical slyphs that live in the cloud and eat chemtrails too!

educate-yourself.org...

I mean can you prove that slyphs are not eating the chemtrails? A chemtrail webpage says it is happening



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 04:17 PM
link   
reply to post by firepilot
 





Well, that IS one of the chemtrail beliefs. And we cant forget the magical slyphs that live in the cloud and eat chemtrails too!


Again, you bringing this up.

Noone else is talking about that here.



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 04:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Point of No Return
reply to post by firepilot
 





And there was once a study also about digging canals with nuclear bombs.


Did people actually witness this, ot think they were witnessing this?

If not, bad analogy.


Excellent analogy.

www.globalsecurity.org...



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 04:33 PM
link   
Not really the same thing since there is no evidence of a canal secretly being built.

Unlike the skies where people say "it's not chemicals, it's just normal vapor trails from increased air traffic!"

Now, if there were explosions and what looked like a canal being dug and people were saying "It's just natural earthquake activity!" , after this study had been done...well.



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 04:34 PM
link   
Take a look at this,






posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 04:41 PM
link   
reply to post by DCDAVECLARKE
 


??

I thought you were arguing in favor of "chemtrails"??

Well....now you've probably got them all mad at you...'cause this sure blows any last shred of 'crediblity' they may have been clinging to...

Good job!!



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 04:44 PM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 


No, bad analogy. People are seeing , or think they see chemtrails right now, after there was a patent describing it.

Did anyone when witness or think they were witnessing the activity in the patent he used as example?

No, so, bad analogy.



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 04:45 PM
link   
reply to post by DCDAVECLARKE
 


Jeah good job!




posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 04:47 PM
link   
reply to post by weedwhacker
 

What the f"£%k are you on about?



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 04:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by DCDAVECLARKE
reply to post by weedwhacker
 

What the f"£%k are you on about?


He's saying you're discrediting the whole "chemtrail" idea by posting those vids of chemtrails and UFO's.

I think there might be something to it. UFO's do seem to be attracted to things like that.



posted on Jul, 25 2010 @ 04:55 PM
link   
reply to post by __rich__
 


LOL!

You funny guy!


I think there might be something to it. UFO's do seem to be attracted to things like that.


Good.....needed to lighten it up a bit....

~~

...unless....Nah! You weren't serious! Pshaw, what was I thinking?

....you weren't --- WERE YOU??









[edit on 25 July 2010 by weedwhacker]



new topics

top topics



 
13
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join