Conspiracy Chicks 03: Raoul Moat Manhunt, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 60 times


reply posted on 25-7-2010 @ 11:53 AM by AshleyD
reply to post by BSG75


It was biased in favour of him (in my opinion), and was completely obscene even for ATS.


I actually gathered the complete opposite of that interpretation and it seemed like Julie was actually asking 'Huh?' in regards to those (the MSM and citizens) who were enamored with the criminal, wanted him to not be apprehended, and created Facebook pages in homage to him.

She even ends with this in rebuttal to all of the positive recognition he was receiving:

But the fact is, he chose to break the law that made him end up in prison in the first place. We have to remember that millions of people are in prison and lose their loved ones or relationship and this does not lead them to go on a shooting spree.


Seemed pretty cut and dry to me she was 'perplexed' and a bit taken back by all the support a murderer received as if he was some celebrity in the style of Natural Born Killers.

Looks like your 'astonishment' is a bit misplaced there.

[edit on 7/25/2010 by AshleyD]


reply posted on 25-7-2010 @ 02:54 PM by EspyderMan
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by ExPostFacto
I must admit I didn't watch the whole thing though, as I was already familiar with every topic they brought up to discuss.
It was still interesting to hear their commentary even on the topics I was familiar with. For example I think Julie made some good points about the safety of sunscreen topic and Ashley made some good points about passing laws to make it legal to videotape police action when it should already be legal, and so on. They really do add their own insights to the topics instead of just regurgitating what's in the thread, that's what makes it interesting.


That's great but you don't need to make a video to reply to a post or give your opinion on topics of the week. That could simply be a blog.
I personally think this thing is good for those interested but lacks the polish you want from a video so within a minute your turned off, and so it gets turned off as well.

I suggest sticking to written media and keep it an opinion peice and ensure we all know its opinion. I think that would work better.

I sometimes think the "chicks" are just a ploy to get the site more popular and since Males rule this type of domain and are the majority of site visitors its like they are trying to manipulate us by using pretty girls to push their agenda.

I think this siite is becoming to main stream and they are slowly becoming the MSM we all love to hate.

Sorry girls, thumbs down. I like my news factual, polished and informative. Not regurgative opinion peices.


reply posted on 27-7-2010 @ 12:40 PM by Esoteric Teacher
reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com




Ashley & Julie,
santa said you girls have been good. merry christmas.
these are for you two, and the conspiracy chicks project.
as far as i'm concerned, you can do with these what you want.

the first may fit better.
the second may not fit, however thought you might want it.
...................................................................................................................................................... ..............................................................................................................





www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...


No one that knows me wants me to fight.
When everyone wants me to fight, no one knows me.
When no one knows me I am alone.
When I am alone, I am not home.
When I am not home, I want to go home.
When I cannot go home, I want to bring home to me.
When I cannot bring home to me, and I cannot go home, … no one I know wants me to fight.









[edit on 27-7-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^