It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sri Oracle
I'm not "hoping" anything happens. I'm simply pointing out how ridiculous it was to come to a thread with scientific evidence supporting atrocity and to say, neener neener neener... I did it... "come and get me".
Originally posted by Sri Oracle
and at the end of the day... a few human shields were killed... and a many mosques and civilians killed as well...
... and then the next day came... and the situation had past; it was over.
Originally posted by Sri Oracle
What the US has done throughout the middleast with its DU tipped bullets will last for generations and generations to come, causing neonatal deformities for as far as you can imagine into the future.
Originally posted by Sri Oracle
That is an entirely different scale of travesty... and to commit such travesty while claiming to have international "moral high ground" is disgraceful.
Originally posted by Sri Oracle
The insurgents may have not been "right", however the forewarned evil of US use of WP and DU going unheard is clearly and unequivocally wrong.
What scientific evidence supporting what atrocity? I haven't seen any scientific evidence linking DU usage to birth deformities etc.
Originally posted by Sri Oracle
I'm simply pointing out how ridiculous it was to come to a thread with scientific evidence supporting atrocity
Exactly. In fact, there could be several other explanations. I'm not sure that it isn't DU or that DU may not be a contributor, but I AM saying it's premature to conclude that's the cause or even A cause with the evidence we have right now.
Originally posted by Keyhole
I think it may be a LITTLE premature to start saying that DU ammunition is the definite reason why this is happening.
There COULD also be another explanation as to why this is happening, ...
The WHO report cited earlier in the thread here: www.abovetopsecret.com... doesn't say it's harmless. It talks about health effects, maximum exposure levels, treatment of exposed individuals, etc.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
When will people stop listening to the agenda driven science of the military? Of course they will say it is harmless.
Potential health effects of exposure to depleted uranium
-In the kidneys, the proximal tubules (the main filtering component of the kidney) are considered to be the main site of potential damage from chemical toxicity of uranium. There is limited information from human studies indicating that the severity of effects on kidney function and the time taken for renal function to return to normal both increase with the level of uranium exposure.
So any exposures above that level would be considered unsafe.
The general public's intake via inhalation or ingestion of soluble DU compounds should be based on a tolerable intake value of 0.5 µg per kg of body weight per day. This leads to an air concentration of 1 µg/m3 for inhalation, and about 11 mg/y for ingestion by the average adult.
When an individual is suspected of being exposed to DU at a level significantly above the normal background level, an assessment of DU exposure may be required. This is best achieved by analysis of daily urine excretion. Urine analysis can provide useful information for the prognosis of kidney pathology from uranium or DU. The proportion of DU in the urine is determined from the 235U/238U ratio, obtained using sensitive mass spectrometric techniques.
While that may be true to some extent, the civil courts don't require 100% proof, merely a preponderance of evidence, and there are ways to produce that, none of which I have seen yet in this case.
Originally posted by mordant1
one cannot prove any particular cause for any particular event.
The real Erin Brockovich is more engaging, intelligent and visionary than the personality portrayed by Hollywood. She gained fame as the law office file clerk whose solo investigation established that the health of countless people who lived in and around Hinckley, California had been devastated by exposure to toxic Chromium 6 (hexavalent chromium) coming from a compressor plant owned by the huge electric utility PG&E (Pacific Gas and Electric. In 1996, thanks to the persistent efforts of Erin and Ed Masry PG&E was ordered to make the largest legal settlement in U.S. history, paying out some $333 million to more than 600 Hinckley residents.
According to Geophysisist, Leuren Moret, the equivalent of atomic bombs released by the use of DU in Iraq in 2003 is 400,000 Hiroshima bombs. We need to be clear that these DU particles have a half-life of 4.5 billion years. In other words, its effects will not blow away in a few years.
What we are looking at is something beyond the imagination. DU has been blamed on the health level for the effects of the Gulf War Syndrome, including chronic muscle and joint pain, fatigue, and memory loss among at least 200,000 soldiers.
from the above link
Cancer in Iraq, according to a UN Subcommission, seems to have increased between 7 and 10 times, and deformities, or congenital defects between 4 and 6 times expected levels of the norm. A United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority report said up to 500,000 people would die before the end of the century due to radioactive debris left behind in the desert.