I believe Arizona's Law SB 1070 will go into effect.
I also believe that the Worshipers and Followers of the Savior, Obama will not stop here. They will continue to try and circumvent our State Laws and Federal Laws for Obama and the Democrat Socialist agenda.

I firmly believe the case of Arizona vs. the U.S. Government will set the precedence for this nation's future immigration policy and stance.

It's good to see a federal judge approaching this matter by interpreting the LAW and not personal feelings/biases. We need more judges like this across the country.

I personally wish Arizona all the best and hope that rationality and the law works in favor of Americans this time.

GBD

From my last reading of the ammended law posted online.

I don't see what the problem is.

So Arizona wants to enforce laws that are already on the books? So what.

Ultimately the Federal Government is to blame, If the feds actually protected the border then Arizona wouldn't be doing what they are doing.

It's a response to some very serious problems in their state. I don't blame them.

Personally I don't think that deporting people is going to fix anything. But it's their time to waste.

Missouri is not on the border and therefore not a problem in the saviors eyes.

hes only concerned with getting them on this side of the fence and getting them papers. i dont think he cares where they go after that. essentially theres only 4 states that need to enact similar laws that would solve the issue altogether.

although it wont hurt for more states to jump on the bandwagon and give them less options once they are in.

Well . . . Unfortunately, this "policy" on immigration has been around way before Obama. It's not a partisan issue with this government, although the media and such will make it out to be. Without a catalyst/false flag, the citizens of the U.S. will never go for a NAU . . . and even then, I'm assuming many will fight. The U.S. doesn't want borders, because it's controllers don't want borders. Anyone standing in the way of this goal will be demonized, whether they call you a racist or a terrorist.

It's really not about Obama or the Dems. It's about population control and commerce.

It will be interesting to see where it will go next when the judge finds no merit to the DOJ's case . . . or will TPTB make sure that it ends here. My guess is that they want this to go as high as possible (Supreme Court), before stepping on the will of the people. That would have the greatest effect on creating such a catalyst to move us towards a borderless, but more easily controlled continent.




[edit on 7/23/10 by solomons path]

Originally posted by guohua

Now, you'll have the Obamanites coming on this thread and demanding to know What Political Gains is Their Dear Leader Obama goning to Gain? These my friends are the Obama Faithfuls the Worshipers at the Alter of Obama, they see no wrong be done in handing over our Country and Our Freedoms to Criminals.

i got a great email the other day comparing obama to bush,

i'd like to know how anyone can support obama after reading the email, it kinda confirms for me just what you said, "Obama Faithfuls the Worshipers at the Alter of Obama, they see no wrong be done in handing over our Country and Our Freedoms to Criminals."

hope its ok to post,

here it is

Would you have laughed?

If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?

If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan's holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?

If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia , would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the non-existent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?

If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current in their income taxes, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had stated that there were 57 states in the United States , would you have said that he is clueless.
If George W. Bush would have flown all the way to Denmark to make a five minute speech about how the Olympics would benefit him walking out his front door in Texas , would you have thought he was a self important, conceded, egotistical prick.

If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to "Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the 5th of May (Cinco de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?

If George W. Bush had mis-spelled the word "advice" would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as proof of what a dunce he is?

If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he's a hypocrite?

If George W. Bush's administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?

If George W Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans , would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?

If George W. Bush had created the position of 32 Czars who report directly to him, bypassing the House and Senate on much of what is happening in America , would you have approved.

If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?

So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this in 10 months -- so you'll have three years and two months to come up with an answer.

Originally posted by guohua
She also questioned the argument that federal law "pre-empts" (i.e. trumps) the Arizona statute.
******SKIP******
Federal Law Does Not "pre-empts" (i.e. trumps) Arizona State Law.

If Federal Law "TRUMPS" state, or even county laws, how do some counties prohibit alcohol to be sold in their county when the Federal Law says alcohol is not prohibited anymore and is legal?

Are these counties "trumping" the Federal Law then?

All this Arizona law is doing is strengthening the Federal Law against illegal immigrants!

I thought States could add to state laws/or penalties that may strengthen Federal Laws or penalties, but they couldn't do less than what a Federal Law required.

[edit on 7/23/2010 by Keyhole]

Originally posted by guohua
this is all being done for Obama and his Ego and his pride.

It is a challenge to try and change the mind of a Obamanite. They truly believe this law is racist and illegal and can not be enforced.

I guess you just don't "GET" what I was trying to say in my last post.

Good luck with this thread, I hope the "name calling" stops and this thread REALLY looks into the LEGAL issues of this subject and doesn't continue on the way your trying to get it to go.

If people do want to talk about "IF" Arizona's new law is legal or "WHY" it might not be, the way the judge in the article was saying, I might revisit this thread.

But until then , ....

P.S,
I live in Florida, there are A LOT of illegal immigrants here too!

[edit on 7/23/2010 by Keyhole]

This is the same Federal judge that is allowing Mexico to have a comment in the case.

This judge is a treasonist pig, expect Arizona to lose.