reply to post by Springer
reply to post byUnknown Soldier
Well at this point he has changed his story. He originally claimed that he had genes linked to African and Indian origins. When I said he's probably
albino, he said that his face is European. So then I went ahead and typed in his data and it matched a Caucasian, thus I said he lied. He said he did
not lie, and that the probability was low. So I went ahead and typed in a constant. An average man's genes. Again, the same numbers showed up. in
fact, they showed a human being was more alien then he was.
When confronted with this he accused me of moving around his origins when in fact he had stated these matters.
He's changed his story and changed his evidence. And he's still using faulty evidence.
I'm still questioning his mind for several reasons as well. I am still discussing the matter with the user, but in conversation with him in his own
topic, I am also observing the fact that he stopped posting anywhere else. He was basically fishing for someone to talk to. And even after most if not
all of his proof is proven wrong, he basically runs around in circles.
He is either a schizophrenic, a troll, or simply bored.
I think this is the main problem we all have here and it is the original topic I think. Should a person with all his credentials disproven and showing
signs of wanting nothing more than attention be allowed to continue posting his story as legitimate. It is, by definition, causing ignorance.
His case at this point is arguing that because his racial genetics don't match how he looks like, that he is an alien. That's quite a different
claim compared with his original statement that because his genes do not match at all with any group of humans he's an alien. That last part would be
interesting if true. However, we do now know that he is, even if a very little amount, related to European members of humanity, matching his facial
At the end of the day, do you allow a liar to continue posting what he claims as truth?
I recall user MolecularPHD from this topic.
I had a legitimate conversation with him and seriously thought he was telling the truth. He had a lot of us fooled. But then we recognized he was a
liar, discredited his claimed, and he was banned.
Now I have gotten into the largest debates with some of the people I hate the most on this site but I would never ever ever ask for them to be banned
because we both of us use actual sources and have good talks without any ignorance. We do not lie, we talk and generate ideas and provocative
thoughts. It's the soul and blood of this site.
But quite simply, this user is lying and distorting the truth and is really indifferent to MolecularPHD at this point.
His posts really should be in the hoaxes at this point.