They are trying to turn the whole issue into another BP blame fest. What they are really doing is covering up the fact that the planned appeal would have cast even more doubt on the conviction, and brought into play evidence that was held back from the defence in the original trial, all of which was circumstantial at best.
Of course, Tony Blair was likely the one who brokered the deal to get the guy back to Libya, paving the way for the BP deal there, but why isn't he being called to answer questions? Maybe Gordon Broon will be summoned to stand before congress like a naughty schoolboy as well?



