It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New pic of China Airport UFO?

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 05:16 PM
link   


www.earthfiles.com...

Has anyone seen this photo before or could it actualy be as reported?

"Image submitted to Earthfiles.com from an American-Chinese businessman with
contacts in Hangzhou, China, who has asked to remain anonymous [ see large image
in Earthfiles report.] “The photo is real per my trusted employee. Taken between
8 PM and 9:30 PM on July 7, 2010, within 25 kilometers of Xiaoshan Airport
in Hangzhou. The buildings match the area."

My questions of ATS are: is this photo new? What apprears in this photo? I am not an expert in photo debunking so asking for help. Thank you.

Fixed link

[edit on 21-7-2010 by Overtime]




posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 05:18 PM
link   
Cutting a tree with a giant light saber? Doesn't seem to be a good idea..
off the record: this photo seems very problematic.



posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 05:20 PM
link   
reply to post by deccal
 


Agreed, very problematic for sure. Sorry but this pic just looks edited.



posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 05:21 PM
link   
Not sure if this picture is new or not.

But it looks to me like a rocket. But im no expert



posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 05:22 PM
link   
reply to post by deccal
 


Why off the record? Is it because the rear part of the red object looks in front of the trees and the nose looks behind



posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 05:23 PM
link   
Well thats closer to others that have been on the net.
The media keep showing video of what seems to be a missile but this photo seems to be in line with others of the Ufo.



posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 05:23 PM
link   
this pic was already posted
www.abovetopsecret.com...

halfway down

[edit on 21-7-2010 by GezinhoKiko]



posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 05:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by VicMT09
reply to post by deccal
 


Agreed, very problematic for sure. Sorry but this pic just looks edited.


Yes i think you may be right, the more i look at it, it does seem to have been edited. I take photos all the time and sometimes edit them, so i can see what you mean. Looks like the "ufo" has been made to look brighter than it is.



posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 05:35 PM
link   
reply to post by GezinhoKiko
 


Looks like they concluded its a hot dog on fire


I bet alot of people missed it ther and I hope deserving of its own thread.



posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 05:35 PM
link   
Looks to be what the other pictures have turned out to be.....long exposures of an airplane. If the first photos have gotten called out, then this should probably be as well.

forgetomori.com...



posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 05:39 PM
link   
reply to post by boo1981
 


Your saying the fire part or the red part or both appear brightened?



posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 05:42 PM
link   
photo is a fake

note all the light emitting from the craft
and yet not a single ray of light shined
on the sides of those buildings facing
the object. The buildings are dark.

fake



posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 05:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Overtime
reply to post by boo1981
 


Your saying the fire part or the red part or both appear brightened?


Yes, it looks like someone has messed about with the contrast and brightness of the photo.



posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 05:47 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


There you have it. My point exactly



posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 05:51 PM
link   
In recalling the 2 photos that were in question during the first China UFO report that closed the airport - this one looks to me like an edited over lay of those 2 photos. One of which looked like a missle (not confirmed) and the other a great debate on whether or not it was a helicopter (no confirmed). Nor was it ever confirmed that those 2 photos were actually the UFO that closed the airport. IMO this is an edited photo.



posted on Jul, 21 2010 @ 06:01 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


After studying the pic for lack of building reflection while I may see a little off the top of the far right building, it does appear that the object is in front of the buildings and tree therefore should have reflection from front windows. I think you have debunked it as a fake. Thanks and good work.



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join