This topic is in the War On Terrorism discussion forum.  (rss)


Ossama Bin Laden Captured!


<<  1    2  >>

Topic started on 12-3-2003 @ 06:59 AM by John bull 1


More Follows.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 07:00 AM by John bull 1


Iranian radio states Ossama Bin Laden Captured in Pakistan.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 07:03 AM by dom


I suspect I'm listening to the same sources, but I've just heard this too.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 07:13 AM by arc


Question is - do we believe it to be true?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 07:15 AM by Estragon


There are some very real things happening in Serbia (Djindjic assassination attempt) and Cyprus; but I fancy this is a garbled version of the old story (in to--day's terms) of 2 bin ladin sons captured.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 07:19 AM by John bull 1


I was watching Andrew Neil on the Political Daily program when a piece of paper landed on his desk.He interupted the speaker and stated that a British Surveillence facility monitoring radio stations had picked up uncomfirmed reports that Bin Laden had been captured in Pakistan.I'm looking for more.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 07:23 AM by dom


The BBC has still not published on the frontpage, so I'd assume they're having trouble verifying the report. CNN has no news item for this, and even Ananova, the home of unverified breaking news is not quoting this yet.

As Estragon says, this may just be garbled translation.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 07:24 AM by John bull 1


Nothing on Reuters either.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 07:26 AM by Estragon


Djindjic is dead and that may be very serious. Nothing anywhere on the bin Ladin story: I've just cruised some
Asian sites.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 07:46 AM by observer


Estragon, the death of Djindjic is indeed bad news for Serbia and most likely the rest of the Balkan region. I surely hope that this does not pave the way for the Milosevic wing of the ultra-nationalists to perform a power grab. If they do it could spell trouble for the whole area.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 07:47 AM by John bull 1


This may be it.

reuters.com...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 07:50 AM by John bull 1


You'll have to go via the front page.

www.reuters.com...;jsessionid=1HL55KDRV2U0ECRBAEZSFEY

Anyway it's untrue.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 07:56 AM by John bull 1


Sorry to get everyone exited.I remember Simon Bates anouncing live one BBC Radio 1 that Aliens had landed in Wiltshire in comparison it's not that bad.

Re: Djindjic,Another Serbian assasination before a world war.Who says history isn't cyclatic.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 07:58 AM by Estragon


Well, at least a bit of excitement.
And, I'll try not to break thread; but Djindjic's assassination is potentially explosive ( no pun intended): it may soon surface elsewhere on ATS.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 08:12 AM by dom


No probs john bull, I quite enjoyed that temporary excitement.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 08:20 AM by Estragon


A sharp observation, J-B: I hope it's not an apt or prescient one.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 08:54 AM by MidnightDStroyer


Yet, one thing that I saw there that no one has seemed to have mentioned...The State Department merely says that they haven't heard anything that can be *confirmed*.

And if you have little-to-no faith in any "official" word from the US government (as I do), then there's also the possibility that they're simply denying these early reports for some reason...Say perhaps, to give Bush a little more political leverage (& maybe some more money) to keep searching for bin Laden while keeping the actual capture hushed up. This is not something that I would put past the US government to do.

In other words, my stance remains...Wait & see.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 09:44 AM by jms88


I hope to god we get this guy soon.

If we get him and liberate Iraq watch the DOW go through the roof...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 09:50 AM by ProudAmerican


Wow, I got really excited when I logged on and saw the topic to this thread. Oh well, maybe MD is right. Maybe they're afraid if they announce this, it will divert attention from the war on Iraq!?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2003 @ 10:03 AM by Estragon


Website related, now, cyberchums: thanks to Byrd -coherence is everything: preserve the thread.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:















































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.012 seconds
Page processed in 0.078 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread