Hollyweird..., page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 20-7-2010 @ 12:30 AM by Rockerchic4God
Coming from a psychological perspective (I'm in the mental health field) you have to remember that most of these people are narcissists. True narcissism, contrary to popular belief, has very little to do with admiring one's own looks, although that can be part of it. Narcissism is preoccupation with self importance. Once these people become wealthy and famous, and join in with the "in" club of the Hollywood elite, they compete with each other in whatever is the trendy theme of the moment. For example, one of them adopts one or two third world orphans and shows off "looky how wonderful and loving I am!" so then others have to get in on the act and before long you have half a dozen rich stars adopting African and Asian orphans. Same thing when one of them adopts a cause, like starvation, cancer, etc.

One of the most fascinating "trends" is the whole militant-liberal thing, getting angry and bitter and speaking about about gay rights, conservative-bashing and embracing socialist and marxist values. It's the same phenomenon only the message here is, "Looky how tolerant and progressive I AM!" So the next one has to out-do that guy and so on.

Get the picture? (No pun intended)

So you see, all this stuff they do is ALL about attention-seeking and making themselves seem god-like to their peers and heros to the rest of the world. While it may SEEM like they are concerned for the plight of the starving children in Darfur it really is just about THEM exerting self-importance to garner admiration and adoration - especially if their careers have stalled in the limelight.


reply posted on 20-7-2010 @ 08:13 AM by jeh2324
reply to post by Rockerchic4God



You're absolutely right! They are so concerned that they bring a film crew and pose with the starving children and devastated areas...
Great points!



reply posted on 31-7-2010 @ 09:57 AM by seagull
reply to post by LeftWingLarry



Indeed, and for the most part I do. However, it is increasingly hard to avoid the sanctimonious blather when CNN/Fox et al seem to think their commentary worth while...

I'm curious as to why the media seems to think that their opinion is of such great importance...more so than, say, mine or yours...

Trust me, though... I ignore as best I can.


reply posted on 31-7-2010 @ 01:09 PM by LeftWingLarry
Originally posted by seagull
reply to
post by LeftWingLarry



Indeed, and for the most part I do. However, it is increasingly hard to avoid the sanctimonious blather when CNN/Fox et al seem to think their commentary worth while...

I'm curious as to why the media seems to think that their opinion is of such great importance...more so than, say, mine or yours...

Trust me, though... I ignore as best I can.

In the case of CNN, FOX and etc. it's probably because they employ people just to give opinions. They're pundits- giving their (often short sighted, bigoted or otherwise ignorant) opinions is what they're paid to do, and you'd have to say they do it pretty well.



reply posted on 1-8-2010 @ 09:29 AM by seagull
reply to post by LeftWingLarry



...and you'd have to say they do it pretty well.




They do indeed.


reply posted on 4-8-2010 @ 08:06 AM by mutantgenius
reply to post by LeftWingLarry



True...but its more fun to gripe.
I grew up thinking these people were totally cool. I am surrounded by people who say these things. Hence the aggravation. I am the type to stand in line at the supermarket and express my disgust at Tabloids. This is how I get my kicks!!! LOL



reply posted on 4-8-2010 @ 08:15 AM by LeftWingLarry
Originally posted by mutantgenius
reply to
post by LeftWingLarry



True...but its more fun to gripe.
I grew up thinking these people were totally cool. I am surrounded by people who say these things. Hence the aggravation. I am the type to stand in line at the supermarket and express my disgust at Tabloids. This is how I get my kicks!!! LOL

Like a sort of anti-conformist?


reply posted on 4-8-2010 @ 08:23 AM by canuckistanian
reply to post by jeh2324



I'm as sick of Sean Penn's holier-than-thou attitude as well, but he stayed in Haiti after the cameras left to help out. He also did that at New Orleans with Katrina, so as much as he likes to pontificate, he also rolls up his sleeves and helps out personally without bringing camera crews with him at all times.

I think I'd rather have Sean Penn shake his fist at the sky about military spending v. social program spending than hear about another Kardashian crawling out of the muck and getting more TV time where they can spread their vapidness.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



A Dictator Is The Solution.
  Posted 1 days ago with 15 member flags
The Internet as a case study of Socialism
  Posted 19 days ago with 7 member flags
Why the need for Constant Growth?
  Posted 5 days ago with 7 member flags
Real Socialists. The Friends Of The Conservatives.
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
The Greenbay Packer\'s Prove That Socialism Works.
  Posted 19 days ago with 5 member flags
On What Date Did Human Freedom End?
  Posted 15 days ago with 5 member flags