reply to post by facelift
I think the point you are missing is that people like this man are what GAVE jobs out in the first place, and they are being punished for it. If the
system does not reward those who are successful, the system will fail. And more will be put out of jobs, just like those 187.
In other words, if you really care about people, you will not socialize our government to the point where no one has work or money. That's retarded.
It is backwards thinking to take money from the rich who did something to earn it, give it to the poor who do nothing, and then at the same time
alienate the rich even though they should be thanked. It is rather complicated... but basically, there needs to be balance or else nobody wins.
I'm not saying that we shouldn't take care of the poor, we should. I want them to live comfortably and be taken care of. But without rich people to
pay taxes, and without resources, the poor won't be taken care of, will they? A government can't redistribute wealth that doesn't exist. That is
the main point.
And without incentive to work harder, people really won't. I want to make sure that the poor are comfortable, but I don't think that trying to tear
apart the lives of the rich people who earned them, or government takeover of corporations is smart. Do you want the rich to live just like the poor
people except hated as well? Even though they pay taxes to help the poor? This makes no sense. And only the poor will pay.
What I am advocating is balance and a system where more people are happy. Capitolism, if done right, brings resources into the system. Socialism, if
done wrong, stagnates a country until it turns into a giant ghetto.
I also advocate going into space at some point so that those resources can be tapped, and advancing science.
How many of you have been out in the real world lately? It sucks. There are no jobs. Most of my friends are barely surviving, one is even dying.
Hmm.
[edit on 20-7-2010 by darkbake]
[edit on 20-7-2010 by darkbake]