It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SeekerForLight
I have read the bible, why not read about evolution before making strange unintelligible remarks about it?
Originally posted by randyvs
This is what I call," the double wide standard" evolutionist are holding in the belief of their theory, they keep trying to pass off as fact.
Originally posted by randyvs
They won't for one second consider God or even any kind of spirituality.
Not only is the apple said to be extremely tasty – it has a 'berry nuance' – it is even healthier than your average apple as its red flesh is richer in antioxidants.
You mean the omnipotent all-knowing creator of "junk DNA???
I'm not trying to be offensive but I really wonder how they morally justify eating their Cousins.
reply to post by Titen-Sxull
By the way, in science FACTS are the LEAST important element, facts don't tell you much - they are just pieces of data. A theory on the other hand is a framework within which laws, facts, observations, hypotheses and conclusions are unified. The fact is that when we studied life all the facts point toward evolution. The fossil record, behavioral studies, the appearance of organisms, genetics,
Double standard indeed
This is what I call," the double wide standard" evolutionist are holding in the belief of their theory, they keep trying to pass off as fact. They won't for one second consider God or even any kind of spirituality. For if they do they must consider God to be a possibility and treat that possibility with respect.
Dr. Francis Collins would strongly disagree with you. As the head of the Human Genome Project, Collins is a pretty significant scientist, a biologist who knows evolution is fact and understands the Theory of Evolution as the best explanation for for that fact. He is also an Evangelical Christian who has no trouble at all justifying his personal certainty about both evolution and God's Creation
a biologist who knows evolution is fact and understands the Theory of Evolution as the best explanation for for that fact.
Here is another possible and even more probable definition of THEORY. Cocerning evolution. An idea with in which laws, facts, observations, hypotheses and conclusions are manipulated, unprovable, unfounded, covered up and some times straight out lied about. Why do I say that? Human nature is at play.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by Phlynx
Not only is the apple said to be extremely tasty – it has a 'berry nuance' – it is even healthier than your average apple as its red flesh is richer in antioxidants.
Phlynx what the hell is it with you? You seek out my weakness quite often it seems. I love apples. I admit it, I love em. I love'em when they are crisp and cold. I do love em.
You made that apple sound so good .I want one bad.Damn it
[edit on 18-7-2010 by randyvs]
I love to hear what you think about the apple, but I give you a perfectly good example of human created evolution, and you completely ignore it? It is an example of one species changing from an other! Explain how that doesn't prove evolution. I know it is human created, but it is just speeding up a natural system.
Why try to go around peoving there was a magic that happened without the magician?
So tell me Randy, what answer for this does the Bible have? What does your book of magic say about why the deeper we go in the strata the more simple the organisms become? What does your ancient tome say about why God made man so much like the other apes, so much so as to imply evolution? The Bible has no answers because it was written by primitives who couldn't have known about evolution or any of the evidence we have today, their best answer was that a God did it.