Originally posted by Ouroborus2012
Whew, i'm glad Neformore is here as a moderator with such a condensending tone to let us know how stupid we are for believing such radical and crazy
things such as "chemtrails" exist..
How dare us come to a conspiracy website and think such things when it's so obvious by the data that was given to us about that video that it was
"saturated air" etc..
Oh wait, there was no data and it's just his opinion much like everybody else has their own opinions..
Or maybe, just maybe, I understand the dynamics of an aerofoil passing through saturated air?
And maybe you could understand it too, if you did the reading, looked at the science and understood the concept instead of doing the sheep thing of
looking up, seeing "lines in the sky" that you don't understand and automatically assuming something untoward is happening?
Maybe you could attempt to understand that the atmosphere is full of pockets of warmer and colder air, and is in constant dynamic motion so that no
part of the sky is quite the same as another, so a body moving through the sky can sometimes generate contrails, and other times not?
Is your belief in this subject so blind that you cannot bother to research such phenomena, and instead just choose to follow blindly what people claim
about chemtrails instead of reading and researching atmospheric science dating back to WW2 when contrails were first noticed?
Did you ever consider - just possibly - that I might have been studying this kind of thing, and aviation subjects for many many years, and my
assessment of the video might be born out of that experience?
By your tone, and your arrogant dismissal of my post those things never even crossed your mind at all. Nope. Its just easier to attack in a snide and
sarcastic manner, born out of your own ignorance.
ATS is a conspiracy site. Its also a
discussion board. Its also a place for
intelligent and critical thinking. Yes, that post was my
opinion but I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that, frankly
my opinion of that video is a damned site better informed than yours
is and can be backed by actual science, where as yours is based on..... what exactly?