It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by smurfy
No. Why don't people read the things they post? These are notes for a conference, things to be discussed at the conference. It certainly does not contain anything that says anything is or has been done.
Unlike the control of greenhouse gas emissions, which must be undertaken by all major emitting nations to be effective and is likely to be costly, geoengineering could be undertaken quickly and unilaterally by a single party, at relatively low cost. Unilateral geoengineering, however, is highly likely to impose costs on other countries and run risks with the entire planet’s climate system.
We will probe whether it is possible to limit the use of geoengineering to circumstances of collective action by the international community in the face of true global emergencies and what might happen when there are disputes over when the emergency “trigger” should be pulled.
www.cfr.org...
The document does not say anything is being done. It does not say anything should be done. It says that if it ever becomes necessary to attempt such action it should not be done unilaterally but with international agreement. It says it's a scary idea.
Originally posted by crustas
reply to post by firepilot
There are no ice crystal with air temperature of 35ºC.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by firepilot
Dude, its a fuel dump.
I am 100% sure they are airfarce KC-10 pilots filming fuel dumps and contrails then posting them as chemtrail joke videos.
The guy is in the video commenting in writing EPR Bullets, to which entire websites are dedicated.
eprbullets.com...
This video is a joke video posted by a bunch of airfarce officers screwing around.
All of these "geoengineering" strategies involve great uncertainty and carry significant risks. They may not work as expected, imposing large unintended consequences on the climate system. While offsetting warming, most strategies are likely to leave other impacts unchecked, such as acidification of the ocean, the destruction of coral reefs, and changes in composition of terrestrial ecosystems.
Originally posted by firepilot
Originally posted by Genesis322
Wingtip vortices, contrails and chemtrails ???
1)i667.photobucket.com...
2) i667.photobucket.com...
3)
i667.photobucket.com...
4)
i667.photobucket.com...
1. Mosquito spraying C-130.
2. C-123s, operation Ranch Hand in Vietnam
3. B-24s, from WW2.
4. C-123, same as number 2.
I thought chemtrails was something from the late 90s, that involved large jet aircraft, not something involving Vietnam and World War 2. Apparently it is now.
So, do we now include Vietnam and World War 2 for chemtrails?
Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by smurfy
No. Why don't people read the things they post?
Phage.....
Maybe DICKDAVECLARKE can read it to him!
However, considering DICKDAVECLARK'S apparent orifically challenged state, smurfy had better stand back!
Cheers
Maybe...maybe not
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by smurfy
So...the trials have been done. You know this...how?
CFR is worried about geoengineering being done at all.
All of these "geoengineering" strategies involve great uncertainty and carry significant risks. They may not work as expected, imposing large unintended consequences on the climate system. While offsetting warming, most strategies are likely to leave other impacts unchecked, such as acidification of the ocean, the destruction of coral reefs, and changes in composition of terrestrial ecosystems.
www.cfr.org...
It is not known if any of them will work and they carry other risks. They are worried that a single country might start doing something on their own rather than as a cooperative effort. That was the point of the conference, how to prevent that from happening.