It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Maslo
All things in those pictures were made by evolution, in fact, even those on the right side - they were made by organisms which evolved.
"made by evolution " that makes absolutely no sense.that robot didnt evolve from a "naturally occuring" microchip.but we evolved from a single celled organism,to reptile to mammal?
[edit on 18-7-2010 by consigliere]
you sheeple think man is soooo important,,,no way WE can have creators,huh? theres no one over me!!
dont confuse religious dogma,with common sense.whats so funny,, is for you to be an ATS member, you sure do lean on what the powers that be tell you regarding evolution.
"made by evolution " that makes absolutely no sense.that robot didnt evolve from a "naturally occuring" microchip.but we evolved from a single celled organism,to reptile to mammal?
A coherent light source (e.g., a laser) illuminates a thin plate with two parallel slits cut in it, and the light passing through the slits strikes a screen behind them. The wave nature of light causes the light waves passing through both slits to interfere, creating an interference pattern of bright and dark bands on the screen. However, at the screen, the light is always found to be absorbed as though it were made of discrete particles, called photons.[1][2] If the light travels from the source to the screen as particles, then on the basis of a classical reasoning, the number that strike any particular point on the screen is expected to be equal to the sum of those that go through the left slit and those that go through the right slit. In other words, according to classical particle physics the brightness at any point should be the sum of the brightness when the right slit is blocked and the brightness when the left slit is blocked. However, it is found that unblocking both slits makes some points on the screen brighter, and other points darker. This can only be explained by the alternately additive and subtractive interference of waves, not the exclusively additive nature of particles, so we know that light must have some particle-wave duality.[3]
you see i believe in evolution,,,its a naturally occuring process,,,not to mention obvious,,,but something/someone created it all
Again, watch how evolutionist will react to this - if there’s any logic at all in their reasoning.
Originally posted by consigliere
reply to post by debunky
double slit experiment
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by consigliere
reply to post by evil incarnate
Double Slit Theory.(google it)
once again,,,matter behaves as a wave when not observed
how does anything exist without a observer?
you sheeple think man is soooo important,,,no way WE can have creators,huh? theres no one over me!!
dont confuse religious dogma,with common sense.whats so funny,, is for you to be an ATS member, you sure do lean on what the powers that be tell you regarding evolution.
Originally posted by metalholic
god is an alien otherwise an all loving god would have been astounded that man came together as one...but no god is actually an alien who was afraid to lose power!!!
Originally posted by soleprobe
Good job.... but the evolution theory is very similar to the climate change theory... it's roots are political... thus only logic that directs towards that political objective will be used.
Originally posted by NoHierarchy
Originally posted by soleprobe
Good job.... but the evolution theory is very similar to the climate change theory... it's roots are political... thus only logic that directs towards that political objective will be used.
Actually, you're a bit backwards. The ROOTS of both the theories of Evolution and Climate Change are SCIENTIFIC, they have been made INTO political/ideological arguments (when the actual scientific debates have essentially ended). Usually they're turned into political/ideological arguments by those with a mistrust and without a clear understanding of science. The religious take the cake on this, and most of the anti-science, pro-religion, pro-big-business propaganda is initiated and sustained by the right-wing. The right-wing and many religious people have turned what was a scientific debate, then discussion, into a new senseless debate including conflicts of interest via theology, economics, and closed-minded ideology.