On the assumption you are serious...
Originally posted by DisUglyBoyHere
I would love you to present a debunking video recreating the events.
Why would anyone bother? Already there are some quite good imitations (eg Forgetomori), and how could you duplicate the effect exactly
following the 'videographer' (term used loosely) around?
I would also like some solid evidence on your theory.
There is plenty in this and other threads - and the most damning is the obvious fact that Yalman has NEVER, over all these years, bothered to listen
to those requesting some VERY obvious verifications and checks. These are simple things he SHOULD have done right from the start - things that are
perfectly obvious to anyone with a clue and who was genuine about such a sighting.
The camera used in the video is worth over $3000 alone, he also had a 200mm lens and a tripod.
You could hand me a million dollar piece
of hospital X-ray equipment, and I'm sure I could misuse it beyond belief and show you really clear
internal ufo's... Good equipment can
give lousy results in the hands of a rank amateur (or one who deliberately wishes to deceive...).
Doesn't get much better than that...
This footage looks crisp and authentic while i'm watching it in 240p on my PS3.
Authentic? Authentic what
Given it is such a capable camera, one must wonder:
WHY does he never adjust the exposure/ISO to show the background scene?
WHY does he never zoom back out (in conjunction with the above)?
WHY does he never show a comparable earthly item during his footage to give scalar/optical comparison?
All previous debunking theories have been refuted
No, they haven't. Have you actually read this thread? FTR, I don't think it's a yacht, but it's an interesting idea. We will probably never
know for sure without Yalman's cooperation (like that will happen..). But that idea, and all the others (eg a tin plate..) have not been refuted.
because they lacked little or any evidence at all.
You mean exactly like the stuff you have not
included in this post?
Some of the theories even completely contradicted themselves.
Which one/s? You seem to be eager to offer opinions but absolutely zero specifics...
This footage is at least to my brother and I, along with many other ATS members is genuine.
brothers are bigger than yours I bet, nyer nyer, and one is a photographer, just like me..
And .... genuine what
? I think it is genuine footage too - of a mundane object being misrepresented as something other-worldly by a
If you can prove me wrong I will appreciate it, im not joking.
It's not up to us to prove you wrong - it *was* up to Yalman to get off his backside and do the most basic checks - and he simply ignored those
requests, despite having a LONG time to do so. The only reason I can think of is that he is a fraud. If you can prove me
wrong.. I'll be
surprised. I'm not joking.
Same with this thread - prove it ISN'T a yacht.