The infamous Turkey UFO a yacht?

Thanks, now we can see it clearly does not look like a yacht.

Its conclusive that the Turkey UFO is still unexplained.

thanks for disproving they yacht theory nonsense.

and we can see no photoshop was used

we can see it appears to be real.

Now that the yacht theory was proven wrong.

What is the next idea?

reply to post by fleabit


That is a different object.

It's addressed in the appendix of the analysis.

The location and size are variable, consistent with the hypothesis of vessels and others not so much with the hypotheses, but this time its meaning is very different to what happens with the videos at night.
The characteristics of the images indicate that it would be lights-range boats, and only the lights are due to scattering in the air and lightly mist over several kilometers can not see the image of the ship except the lights are bright enough, which is an extreme case, but very usual, the effect known as aerial perspective.

Originally posted by Paradigm2012
Now that the yacht theory was proven wrong.

What is the next idea?

Nice knee jerk reply there, your lack of ability to read and comprehend is deafening.

:shk:



[edit on 17/7/10 by Chadwickus]

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Paradigm2012

 

Thanks for reading the whole analysis.

:shk:

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by deccal

 

I don't recall seeing it higher, but it has been a while since I've watched all of the videos.

Can you remember in which video you saw it higher?

I am still trying to find it. The one you referenced in responding to my post is -not- the video in question. The clip I am talking about has the object nowhere near the surface of the water. They zoom in on the object, zoom out a bit, you can see it if I remember correctly, a bit left and lower than the moon. Then they zoom in on the moon. Then back out, and back in on the object. It was well above the horizon in that shot, and I think what deccal is talking about.

Also, at 1:17 onwards and a few other shots, I think that the camera is well steady enough, that you would see activity from the ocean make the "window" move, if that is what it is. It doesn't appear to budge an inch.

[edit on 17-7-2010 by fleabit]

After looking at your desperate attempts to call this a yacht or boat. We can now see how it could not be a yacht.

I think you would present decent analysis if you had some real facts.

Didn't anyone notice how the dog kept looking in that direction?

NO BOAT VISIBLE

reply to post by Chadwickus


Well Chad my good man it seems you might be onto something here and I take no pleasure in it because I am one of those believers who did believe that the Turkey footage might be a bit of a smoking gun (subjectively speaking of course).

Starred and flagged for bringing up new possibilities (shakes fist feebly in your general direction).

SORRY KIDS I AM WAY AHEAD OF YOU ON THIS..


YOUR DESPERATE ATTEMPTS TO DEBUNK WILL BE SHOT DOWN EVERY SINGLE TIME.

I AM YET TO SEE ANY DECENT EVIDENCE OF YACHT.

reply to post by Jeronimo


I noticed how at times the dog sounded like it was barking inside, there was a distinct echo.

Here's the video with what sounds like a dog barking inside:



It starts barking around the 2:35 mark.

Then compare that with the dog barking at 4:10.

To me, there is a difference.

[edit on 17/7/10 by Chadwickus]

Originally posted by SmokeJaguar67
reply to post by Chadwickus

 

Well Chad my good man it seems you might be onto something here and I take no pleasure in it because I am one of those believers who did believe that the Turkey footage might be a bit of a smoking gun (subjectively speaking of course).

Starred and flagged for bringing up new possibilities (shakes fist feebly in your general direction).

we can now see it was not a boat.

now what can people make up next?

reply to post by Paradigm2012


Please stop your trolling.

We are trying to discuss this topic and don't need your stupid posts cluttering everything up.

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Paradigm2012

 

Please stop your trolling.

We are trying to discuss this topic and don't need your stupid posts cluttering everything up.

I can share my analysis with you.

I am light years ahead of anything I see so far presented here.

reply to post by Paradigm2012


Aye, I am just getting up to speed now as I read through the thread. I was just addressing Chads well written post and starring it for that reason for the work he put in.

Now to see if the encounter can be debunked and if there are new things that can allow it to be put to rest. In any case it does not matter because I have seen/felt UFO’s many times now so I personally do not need proof – hence the joviality on my part.

[edit on 17-7-2010 by Paradigm2012]

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Jeronimo

 

I noticed how at times the dog sounded like it was barking inside, there was a distinct echo.

If the dog was barking outside on the beach how could your theory be possible that the dog was inside.

Was there an invisible house surrounding the dog that was cloaked?

can you show evidence to support your invisible house around the dog theory?