It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by adigregorio
reply to post by fleabit
Um NO
You said:
P.S. The "drawing" of a yacht window is laughable. Not only was the overlay ridiculous (it did not actually remotely resemble the shape of the object, other than it was slightly arced)...
Now you have changed your mind?
Jesus H Christ
Again.
Originally posted by adigregorio
reply to post by GeminiSky
BS!
All I did WAS TRACE the ILLUMINATED AREA.
I put the other image RIGHT UNDER it. I SEE the DARK LINE in between the LIGHTED area.
Why is this "impossible"?
I have done much defense, yet I have not seen much "why this is impossible"
Other than ad hominem attacks, and statements of "That's not possible"
And WTF "A Mirage of a Yacht"
(As long as it isn't a yacht!)
LOL And I just said it was possible for it to be a yacht. How do "you" know it can't be?
Jesus H Christ
Originally posted by Paradigm2012
Originally posted by SupremeKnowledge
The video doesnt show him zooming in or out at all,
1 scene is far away, next scene its a super close up,
You cant even tell if they are the same object....
It is possible that he got footage of a light in the sky,
then edited a ufo miniature model in between the outdoor shots....
Or maybe he was switching camera lenses...
I want to see the unedited footage...
[edit on 17-7-2010 by SupremeKnowledge]
What you just typed was proven wrong about 100 times but we appreciate you taking the time to try again.
Come up with something else
Because that was shot down long time ago.
Originally posted by fleabit
1. The camera IS still enough in many shots to determine that the object is not moving... not at all. This is an issue, as the ocean is a turbulent thing. And consider these were taking over the course of a long period.
2. The lighting is just off in so many ways. There is no anchor light. There is supposedly nothing BUT the window illuminated. Repeatedly, again, over the course of a year. No deck, not anything.
3. Let's combine theories to make it more plausible! It's a complex mirage of a yacht! A repeating mirage of the same yacht over the course of a year.
4. There is only one boat. Why?
5. In the shots in clearer light, there is obviously no visible boat. More mirage-y stuff, I suppose.
6. These guys are obviously hoaxers if this is true. They live on the coast. They probably know every docked yacht in that area. Yet they filmed it as if it were something special.
7. The professional analysis said clearly, this was an object, and it was NOT a case of mistaken identity. But then.. I keep forgetting, people on this board are much smarter than paid professionals.
Originally posted by fleabit
Are you privy to how this film was edited and by who? Or why? Or just jumping to conclusion?
This was at least analyzed by one professional agency, who said it was an actual, structural object. Not a mirage, not a toy.. but a thing.. sitting there. But of course, again, I'm sure you know more than a paid professional, don't you. Most everyone here on ATS is a frigging bonafide scientist.
Originally posted by SupremeKnowledge
Originally posted by fleabit
Are you privy to how this film was edited and by who? Or why? Or just jumping to conclusion?
This was at least analyzed by one professional agency, who said it was an actual, structural object. Not a mirage, not a toy.. but a thing.. sitting there. But of course, again, I'm sure you know more than a paid professional, don't you. Most everyone here on ATS is a frigging bonafide scientist.
I won a Nobel Peace Prize for creating the theory of folding time and space to travel across the universe without breaking the laws stated in Einsteins Theory...
And NASA donated 2 million dollars to the public schools in my area to fund a space education program.....
Originally posted by fleabit
Most everyone here on ATS is a frigging bonafide scientist.
Originally posted by SupremeKnowledge
reply to post by GeminiSky
I was replying to the comment
Originally posted by fleabit
Most everyone here on ATS is a frigging bonafide scientist.
It is always turbulent? There is never enough calm to cause a boat to sit motionless? (Or at least give the appearance that the boat is not moving?)
We already discussed that not all ships always use their lights. Just because the lights are missing, does not make this impossible. Because, maybe the lights were turned off.
Really? Or is this one sarcastic. I mean I get the feeling it is allowed to be anything but a yacht.
Why not? Are you suggesting a person can pilot two boats at once?
Obviously? I disagree, since (if/maybe) the boat had its lights off you would not see the boat in the dark.
... how do we know that they are hoaxers? ...
You sure spout "obviously" alot. Then you make this statement? I have been saying, the whole time, possible. Yet you, a professed "non professional" (by that statement, I assume this) say things like "obvious" and "not possible". Why is it impossible?