It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The infamous Turkey UFO a yacht?

page: 10
48
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 09:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by FlySolo

Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


I figured it was nightime there just figured there would be a little more from him. Didn't really think about the time though and for that I apologize for my earlier remarks. I forget about the time difference between here and there. I guess I am just used to the time difference here in the states. I guess I need to pay better attention.


Why? Maybe maybe not is up posting and he is from there


FlySolo.....

Chadwickus is 3 hours behind me on the other side of the country.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not




posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 09:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus




adigregorio;

The light in A is clearly reflecting off the exterior. The concave shape comparison can be used infinitely, its a geometric shape. If the light source really is from the interior then the window is much smaller than the example given of the yacht. Actually discrediting the hypothesis further.



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 09:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Paradigm2012
 


If you have been around boats and waterways for any length of time you would know that certain lights have to be used while underway or anchored.....


And if you had been around cars and roads for any length of time you would know that certain lights have to be used while driving or turning.


They don't put those lights on there just because they are pretty. They are on there for a reason.


And what makes water users any different to roadusers?

People sometimes don't bother using the correct lights. High beam headlights dazzling oncoming drivers, no lights at all when it's dusk or raining, no indicators when turning, no fog lights in fog.

Many of these common sense factors are requirements....but not everyone follows them. A person in charge of a yacht is still a human being and as fallible as any other vehicle user. (Particularly if he has his lady friend out there for a sh*g in the dark or to make a porno without the glare of unwanted lights ;-)



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 09:49 PM
link   
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 





Chadwickus is 3 hours behind me on the other side of the country.


Yep and it would of taken another hour or so after he choked on his weatabix reading some of these posts


I suggest that some should read Chadwickus's older posts, he isnt a debunker or a disinfo. Read his thoughts on other well known ufo sightings and you may just understand that the man dislikes what we call porky pies and seeks the truth


Wal



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 09:50 PM
link   
reply to post by auswally
 

I heard he actually likes Vegemite.



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 09:58 PM
link   
ATS Team:

My initial & subsequently increasing concerns pertaining to this case are as follows:

- The viewing angle is not consistent with an object at a significant elevation & a significant distance

- Only 1 person filmed the object

- The “expert analysis” is subject to a conflict of interest (read $)

- Many of the expert supporters are also subject to a conflict of interest (read $)

That leads me to wonder if much of the obfuscation via the many enhanced & significantly edited videos has been disingenuous.

Therefore, in view of the extremely high “UFO smoking gun” profile of this video, it is important that we carefully review:

- The prosaic explanations such as hoaxing via the use of a model or other small object, the “boat” option, etc...

- The background of the “experts” that are pushing the “alien spacecraft” position so aggressively.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 10:15 PM
link   
The video doesnt show him zooming in or out at all,
1 scene is far away, next scene its a super close up,

You cant even tell if they are the same object....

It is possible that he got footage of a light in the sky,
then edited a ufo miniature model in between the outdoor shots....

Or maybe he was switching camera lenses...

I want to see the unedited footage...

[edit on 17-7-2010 by SupremeKnowledge]



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 10:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by free_spirit
 


So I thank you for your words, but unfortunately they don't carry as much authority as
they once did.


Completely OUT OF TOPIC. And to carry authority you say? Authority for what can you
tell? What are you talking about here, authority? Above who or whom, you sound more
and more disconcerting. But wait of course I touched a nerve right, and now you are
pissed off because of my comments, and you said “I went to the throat”? You mean
like a killer with a knife, what is wrong with you. Didn't you requested thoughts from
the members when you opened this thread? Well my response was direct and with
arguments pertaining to this particular incident as usual in this forum or not?

But you said “I went to your throat and lost my authority” What an absurd claim. It‘s
clear you want to divert the attention of my questioning as usual with skeptics in this
matters going out of topic as an easy way out of compromise.

Let‘s go back to the topic and put aside your personal anger. I must remind you this
topic of your thread is the incident on the beach of that specific day,sighting and
footage. Please be serious and don't generalize mentioning other sightings from the
same place by the same witness, This is your thread and this is the actual topic so
let's stay with this incident. I must remind you that my information sources are Mr.
Haktan Akdogan, main researcher of this case and Mr. Yalcin Yalman, main witness
and videographer, I was and still are in direct contact with them and following every
incident in that place. I mentioned this in other threads and even provided some clear
high resolution frames from raw footages I been provided by them, if you didn't knew
this you may read all the other threads about the Kumburgaz case, clarification done.

At this point the subject is still very confusing, some say this and some say that wich
proves is still controversial, precisely that's my point, the incident remains controversial
and needs a very good investigation in order to IDENTIFY the lights in the video, in
order to solve this mystery. But also in order to debunk this sighting in a serious and
professional way a strong, convincing evidence is required. I would be first one to be
very interested to find the answer to this incident, to solve the mystery and I mean it.
But the incident remains unexplained and this is a fact.



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 10:21 PM
link   
reply to post by free_spirit
 


Free spirit.....

There's the small matter of the higher resolution video.

But then again.....

I guess that's locked up with the "yellow UFO spitting out alien orbs" video.

That must be some cupboard they're all locked in.

Cheers
Maybe...maybe not



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 10:25 PM
link   
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


Who do you want the higher res video released to? The public or another investigator?



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 10:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by FlySolo

Originally posted by Chadwickus




adigregorio;

The light in A is clearly reflecting off the exterior.

Really? How about some proof of this "clarity" for I, obviously, don't see it. IN FACT I see the string of lights in the picture A. The exact same as the string in C, only from the outside vs inside.


The concave shape comparison can be used infinitely, its a geometric shape. If the light source really is from the interior then the window is much smaller than the example given of the yacht. Actually discrediting the hypothesis further.

More claims, no evidence.

At least Chadwickus threw in some evidence with his...



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 10:40 PM
link   
Chad Good thread mate, but having said that you usually are correct most of the times not on the yatch theory. I am not ready to buy the yatch theory, have ever thought of an USO. I am not saying its 100 % USO or UFO but the yatch theory dosent fit.

@Para 2012 stop spamming you have got some great points.

@Phage: Sorry Mate your Superior mirage dosent fit either.

@free_Spirit: Your onto something.... i can sense it

As for me I dont like posting much but because i need 200 posts to chat here I am forced, having said that it is rude to post without doing any research.

Cheers guys keep up the good fight ................



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 10:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by ziggyproductions05
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


Who do you want the higher res video released to? The public or another investigator?


The public,
High res unedited full video



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 10:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by ziggyproductions05
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


Who do you want the higher res video released to? The public or another investigator?


Everybody!!!!



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 10:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by SupremeKnowledge

Originally posted by ziggyproductions05
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


Who do you want the higher res video released to? The public or another investigator?


The public,
High res unedited full video


E X A C T L Y !!!



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 10:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


Flaming, as in, the negative comments directed towards you. You misunderstand.

You also took one part of my post and seemed to be pissed off by it.

I think that sums up your whole attitude about everyone who doesn't agree with what you believe.

I still wish you luck.


Edit: As far as those pics go..... I don't thing aliens were are on Miami Vice, were they?



[edit on 17-7-2010 by KANE OG]



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 10:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


Have they said why they wont release it to the public?



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 10:58 PM
link   
I don't know about a Yacht.

One thing that got my full attention during those videos was the dog.
Barking in the direction of the sighting.

Struck me as interesting but, could of been a bird or fish it saw or something I don't know.

But interesting none-the-less.



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 11:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by ziggyproductions05
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


Have they said why they wont release it to the public?


Ziggyproductions05.....

Yes!

That is also the case with the original video of this very high profile case as per my previous post:

UFO releases intelligent moving spheres!! First ever video footage!

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



posted on Jul, 17 2010 @ 11:34 PM
link   
reply to post by nerbot
 


I tell you what you would have a better chance of winning the lottery twice before you will see the same boat sitting in the same spot with no lights on.Boat captains are very serious when it comes to safety on their boats. Boat captains make sure that they are following the maritime rules since that is their life and if you are in any kind of situation that shows you to be at fault because you did not have your lights on you may as well forget being a captain anymore, because there is no one that will employ you if you were reckless on the last boat you captained. That will show that you are not serious about the welfare and safety of your crew or your boat.The percentage of boats that will not use the anchor or navigation lights is few and far between. Also the majority of people who drive that do not turn their lights on at night are usually because they are impaired in some way, be it by alcohol,drugs (legal or illegal)or some other reason.



new topics

top topics



 
48
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join