UPDATE: Obama Warns America The (OIL) Cap May Be Removed, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times
Topic started on 16-7-2010 @ 02:48 PM by monkeySEEmonkeyDO

UPDATE: Obama Warns America The (OIL) Cap May Be Removed


www.businessinsider.com
UPDATE: This is not a victory speech, just the opposite.

Obama is warning the desperately optimistic country of problems that could emerge with the new cap. It may be necessary to remove the cap if the oil is leaking out from the ocean floor.



Read more: www.businessinsider.com...
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 16-7-2010 @ 02:56 PM by Chopper
reply to post by monkeySEEmonkeyDO




O no, I was hoping for good news. I was hoping the leak was stopped with this cap. It is impossible for me to trust BP, because they were doing a lousy job in stopping the leak. This really sucks that they might remove it and cause more to gush out.


reply posted on 16-7-2010 @ 03:08 PM by lasertaglover
reply to post by silo13



Yeah, there are a lot of people bashing those that aren't 100% happy that oil leak has been stopped. If you are even concerened a little bit with the leaks from the sea floor, or the long term effects of COREXIT on the environment, or even the actual scope of the magnitute of the underwater oil plumes, a lot of people are saying that we are doom and gloomers. Some of them even go so far as to say that we are sad that the oil leak has been capped!!!

I am glad the leak has been stopped. And I will be absolutely overcome with joy, IF the oil cap stays capped, AND the pressure of the cap does not cause the sea floor to crack open. That is when I'll be happy...or actually, no, I won't be.

I won't be happy and signing Kum By Yah because there are thousands of people without jobs, causing millions of dollars of damage economically, an untold X number of marine species dying, the real probability that what is already in the water will still hit the current taking it around florida, and the still unknown consequences of the aforementioned COREXIT and underwater plumes!!!

Darn it people, the real DANGER of this oil spill is in way over yet!


reply posted on 16-7-2010 @ 03:13 PM by jazz10
reply to post by monkeySEEmonkeyDO



right on the money, basically its ok to tell us this part and info but the only reason they are doing that is because secretly they are well aware of whats going on? Or should i say what they have done. They think that the worst is over?We havent even begun. As for the blame and the financial situations of compensation? WTF

JAIL THEM

Because this is exactly what i said would happen from the start. Now when i say that this could be an ELE (Extinction Level Event) people may stop calling me a fear monger etc etc. Ignorance. The signs are there to be seen. My opinion? We have turned her over one too many ties and now we will reap what we sew. They caused it and # rolls downhill and the buck will lie with the tax payer. BP to pay up? No the people that buy their product will pay. A fitting punishment? Jail. Period. They have put the lives of countless people and wildlife at risk through their asshole behaviour, deaths? Criminal charges to all involved. Especially considering they were drilling deeper than the specified tolerances.



reply posted on 16-7-2010 @ 03:28 PM by westcoast
Perhaps THIS is why?

All sorts of reasons why they would want to keep it from us.


reply posted on 16-7-2010 @ 03:47 PM by davidmann
reply to post by monkeySEEmonkeyDO


There's a lot that we as non-specialists are lacking in information, but pressure and bore integrity are things that we all can cipher. On the face of it, a messy bore is a problem. If this high pressure blowout ripped up the shape and structure of the bore, it is something not to be trifled with. A couple of miles through solid earth may sound really safe but those same two miles seem small when you consider the forces involved. I believe that the idea of relief wells or bores are to escape beneath whatever bore ruin may have occurred, as to establish integrity, pressure, sealing effect etc....

Of course they may deem it necessary to relieve some pressure at the new valve or BOP or whatever it is that weighs 450 tons.....hopefully they are equipped to capture the oil/gas. Does it mean 'doom' if they deem it necessary to open it? All of a sudden everyone's Chance Buckman. Just think...that long bore may be ripped up and exposed all up and down it's length, and for all we know about recorded and inferred history, this may be an extinction event. I don't believe I've ever seen a show which suggested that a huge mingling of the ocean's water, with the oil and gas, caused extinctions or ice ages etc...Think how many millions of years must be between that separated oil and water...that we call our ground and shores. I am thinking that the BP guys are seriously fighting between themselves whether to seal it, using the best cement method they can use, or to chance harnessing a weakened, irregularly shaped bore.... I am speculating here, but I believe the chain is only as good as it's weakest link' analogy fits perfectly when dealing with pressure and the mechanical means to contain it. It will find the weakest link! BP is hoping that the many fissures will slowly re-coagulate and form a stable vessel all around, this means sea floor, everywhere. Maybe they are thinking 'seal it' and tip toe dance away to better prospects, a name change or what have you. I do wonder how Ayn Rand would draw up these guys. They come along, tap the earths engine, call it fossil origin, get every school marm and text to lie about it for them, and they handle it like cheap champagne on the last day in time...stringing up lobbies like spiderwebs to keep the practiced lies intact and enforced...is this 'free enterprise'??? Is this 'capitalism'? I mean...who 'gave' them this aspect of the earth's engine to just 'own' and dispense?

I hope they get a handle on it. I hate to say it, but patience is probably needed for the best outcome of slow re-coagulation of the entire affected area. It is always best to perform one variable at a time, time permitting, in any experiment. This may be a thin scab that is on top of a large artery. We are hearing nothing about the terrifying prospects of a worst case scenario (ie., possible extinction level event) . I suggest that we brace ourselves for more carbon tax assaults if, and when, the thing gets under control. They'll figure that we're due for more government regulated lies, once the sea is no longer under direct oil threat, and old Joe Lieberman and Father Al Gore and all will be wrapping their lips around football fields to make their thing work. Not sure which is worse.....

The ground took time to get damaged...it'd be wise to give it time to re-pressurize.


reply posted on 16-7-2010 @ 04:09 PM by getreadyalready
reply to post by davidmann





I am thinking that the BP guys are seriously fighting between themselves whether to seal it, using the best cement method they can use, or to chance harnessing a weakened, irregularly shaped bore....


I think you are wrong about this part. The first well is always the hardest and most expensive. They encounter a lot of Earth's strata, they learn a lot along the way, and they map out what they learned. To drill a new well is very easy in comparison. I am sure they have no intention of using this well. The Relief Wells are being drilled very quickly with little fanfare because of everything they learned on the original. They won't chance another expensive leak, or loss of life, or loss of equipment.

Nope. They are trying to salvage what they can and get the relief wells in place and seal off this nightmare. They may drill a new well and harvest the reservoir, but they won't risk this well.

As for the extinction level event:
There are a great many possibilities, and ATS is rife with them. They are all highly unlikely, but many of them are plausible. The most plausible being a reduction or contamination of food source for a big portion of the Earth. Another is the possiblity of a Methane release or Methane explosion. Contrary to popular belief, the explosion is not at all necessary to have a catastrophic tsunami, oxygen depletion, or greenhouse effect. Other less likely scenarios would have to do with weather pattern and ocean current changes, etc.

Don't rule out the extinction level idea, but don't worry about it either. Just be informed and wait and see. That is all we can do.


reply posted on 16-7-2010 @ 06:14 PM by StarTraveller
Just to add as there was mention of low pressure:


Pressure continues to rise and is currently above 6700 psi.

also all feeds from all linked websites are currently down as of 00.10GMT



[edit on 16-7-2010 by StarTraveller]


reply posted on 16-7-2010 @ 07:14 PM by Chance321
Originally posted by StarTraveller
Just to add as there was mention of low pressure:
Pressure continues to rise and is currently above 6700 psi.
also all feeds from all linked websites are currently down as of 00.10GMT
[edit on 16-7-2010 by StarTraveller]



Just curious. Now, I'm assumeing that the increasing pressure is a bad thing. Just wondering how much pressure it would take to pop this new cover off. And just wondering what is causing all this pressure, you'd think with the leak plugged that the pressure should be leveling off.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



New Oil and Tar Balls Litter the Gulf Coast After Hurricane Isaac
  Posted 4 days ago with 26 member flags
Did BP delay sealing the well so they could use it later?
  Posted 2 days ago with 3 member flags
Beach report - St. George Island, FL
  Posted 4 days ago with 2 member flags
Mass die offs still occurring?
  Posted 15 days ago with 1 member flags
Yangtze river turns into tomato juice in China ( picture inside)
  Posted 4 days ago with 1 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

PROOF 9/11/01 was an inside job
  9/11 Conspiracies: 13 hours ago, 34 replies
The man thread
  General Chit Chat: 17 hours ago, 33 replies
I have a new Kitten....
  General Chit Chat: 13 hours ago, 24 replies