reply to post by wcitizen
You said it beautifully! TY!
OP: I agree with portions also, but with others I will respectfully disagree. Apologies, I haven't mastered the art of the quoting here.
OP: "It angers me, because even after the well has capped,"
The well was capped? You saw this first hand did you? On the feed? In the gulf? How deep did you go to witness?
We could have met for a
margarita to celebrate the southern way.
Point: Just like Wcitizen said, they aren't facts. Actually, discussing this scenario with oil field veterans, they just laugh.
OP: "Just because you heard XXXX from YYYY doesn't mean XXXX is going to happen or that YYYYY is even as credible a source as you seem to
Agreed with the first portion, not the second. I am one of those with a or some "sources". I believe they are credible because they are on the
water in this mess, they've befriended other sources that won't go public, that are also assisting in this mess, and so on, and on. I believe the
residents on the coast with sources rather than other things I read all over.
The methane issue.
Crack in seabed & possible fault line issue
OP: "some of you WANT this catastrophe to continue so you can propogate more of this world ending doomsday nonsense."
Some may, I can pretty much say for myself, having this "in my backyard", I don't - agreed.
OP: "Like the topic on the main page about BP "obviously" covering up another leak. Everyone's acting like that's some sort of fact, when the
reality is it's nothing more than wild speculation. Treat it as such."
I'll still keep my mind open, although I don't believe its wild and I personally won't treat it as such, but others will. I have posted multiple
times, yes from my source, that they hit a Hydrogen Sulfide field, that's not being reported.
Is my source sucking in too much Corexit?
Hadn't thought of that, being on a boat an all, but could be.
Like I first said, I partially agree. May I suggest until all of the info/sources are TOTALLY discredited, don't get angry or aggravated, just
simply say thank you to those passing on another possibility from the area affected.
And why would you ANNOUNCE anger and aggravation? I'm still shaking my head on that one.
Trying to keep it light.