Israel attack wouldn't stop Iran nuclear program, says U.K. study

"Israel attack wouldn't stop Iran nuclear program, says U.K. study" So, if it will not prevent Iran from making a nuclear weapon, why attack? Unless there are "other" reasons to kill half a million people. Israel is desperate for a regime change controlled by the US and thereby controlled by Israel.

Any attack will not only hit nuke sites but factories and university laboratories will also be hit with tremendous civilian casualties. Of course the military targets are almost endless.

This study suggests the attack, if it happens, will ignite a long war throughout the region. A war the US can ill afford.

If this attack happens and the US is involved, everyone should know this is a war for Israel not the US. Iran is no threat to the US. We will spend our treasure and the blood of our young to advance Israels goals. This should NOT happen
www.haaretz.com...

You sorely misconstrue the probable level of destruction. IF Israel attacks Iran, it will probably be nuclear, and it will probably annihilate Iran. The BIBLE prophesies this. Maybe not nuclear, but the eyeballs of standing troops melt in their heads before the bodies hit the ground. Sounds nuclear to me. Survivors flee, and it is a wasteland, a nomans land forever. If I were in charge in Israel, and I was using the Sampson Option, I definitely would hit Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia. According to a Muslim I talked to, this would remove all credibility from Islam. Now it would just be a matter of pure hatred and evil to make war on Israel. Makes it easier for the fella who pretends to be god to take over the Earth. At the same time, I would also use a Neutron bomb on the mosque at the Temple Mount, and to clear the West Bank of terrorists. It would then be open for settlement with noone else in the way.

We all know the reason they have not already is that it is too well hidden.

Every few months on fox, israel is good to go on that bombing mission, but doesn't.

They would of done it by now if it was easy.

True british style, need a study to tell what is obvious.

I personally am more worried about stopping the RACIST STATE OF ISRAEL. The only people that matter in Israel are the Ashkenazi's. They hate all other sub groups of Jews, and to top that off, there is Racism in, and amongst the Ashkenazi's as to who has more pure blood. This usually devolves into highly inbred families vying to be the 100% pure blood.

What does it create? As Moshe Dayan said, make the world think your a mad dog, but with good inbreeding the people in power over there really are mad dogs.

The facts are in, the Terrorist State of Israel holds numerous world records for being the most vile nation on Earth. Not only do they have nukes, but they have openly stated their Sampson Option; which means that if they don't get their way, then they nuke everyone else. So what about their nukes, and the real danger they pose to the rest of the world?

What can anyone do with a rabid dog, but shoot it down. There is nothing else, and instead of worrying about Iran who hasn't invaded another nation in over 200 years, maybe we should be concentrating on the most racist, apartheid ridden, and terrorist nation on Earth; see Israel.

Here's a video:

They say the plan would be to go after the sites they believe there are nuclear weapons activities going on, as they did in Syria. However, I'm thinking there a pretty good chance that Israel is not "going on a bombing mission" because no one is certain whether or not Iran has nukes. For Israel to attack Iran with nukes would be simple insanity. That is not likely to happen.

Originally posted by ~Lucidity
For Israel to attack Iran with nukes would be simple insanity. That is not likely to happen.

Do you have any evidence proving that Israel is sane?

I think it's very possible it may happen.

reply to post by NuclearPaul

Nope. Can't say that I do. Judging on their history, they seem like a loose cannon to me. However, that being said, I honestly don't believe they would strike with nukes that close to home, particularly not at Iran, who is not without allies with nukes.

Originally posted by Gregarious
You sorely misconstrue the probable level of destruction. IF Israel attacks Iran, it will probably be nuclear, and it will probably annihilate Iran. The BIBLE prophesies this. Maybe not nuclear, but the eyeballs of standing troops melt in their heads before the bodies hit the ground. Sounds nuclear to me. Survivors flee, and it is a wasteland, a nomans land forever. If I were in charge in Israel, and I was using the Sampson Option, I definitely would hit Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia. According to a Muslim I talked to, this would remove all credibility from Islam. Now it would just be a matter of pure hatred and evil to make war on Israel. Makes it easier for the fella who pretends to be god to take over the Earth. At the same time, I would also use a Neutron bomb on the mosque at the Temple Mount, and to clear the West Bank of terrorists. It would then be open for settlement with noone else in the way.

This is the most retarded post I read on ATS this month!!

1) Yeah, let's influence current politics and military actions on the Bible...a FICTIONAL book over 2000 years old!! ARE YOU INSANE???

2) Bombard Mecca??? And you think that'll bring peace?? What would happen if the terrorists bomb the Vatican? Would that take all credibility from Christianity? WHAT A RETARDED IDEA!!

3) And you wanna use a nuclear bomb on the Westbank so it's "open for settlement with no one in the way" after that? Would you like to live in a radio active dump?

And all that based on a bible prophecy? I'm speechless! The stupidity of your post is off the scale, and there's no nice way of telling you...

Too little, too late for Israel to do anything. Iran has even more gas centrifuge units than Pakistan (armed with 50-60 nuclear weapons). 5 years ago Iran has only 64 gas centrifuge units, now it is estimated Iran has 7,000 units.