I apologize everyone for my broken articles, both photobucket and youtube banned my accounts long ago destroying some 5 years of work in the process.
reply to post by atlasastro
Do note that I wrote this almost 2 years ago. Also this and its companion pieces are amongst the last real publishing or even online debating I've
done since then so I'm quite rusty while I havent been paying much attention to the 'news' during this time pursuing my own selfsuffiency from this
Anyways, so key accords related to AGW have broken down...
For one thing I'd like to think that the efforts of the 'ground forces' in particular certain interwebs hackers ended up having a major hand in
Moving on, AGW based wealth sequestation is but a contingency. And despite worst case scenario AGW specific 'global government' implementations,
you're missing the point. The point herein is its the justification for endless funding of such systems, of particular relevence being its the side
of the coin to keep the "Dem" half of the population all unwittingly lockstep in the same AGI direction as the "Cons" WoT is the inherent
A 'Mad Max' meltdown is but another contingency, in my view. I didnt mean to make it sound like its absolutely the goal, whereas the real objective
in this vein would be to plunder the wealth of the nations, leaving all but a handful of wealthy amongst them, preventing the global masses from being
able to afford life extension / immortality technologies. It wont take 'Mad Max' to keep everyone too poor to live forever.
Meanwhile can you really argue that AGW type arguments haven't already begun to have a major impact on global wealth? You seem to imply that my
entire piece here is hinged on the success of whether or not the worst case scenario(s) of looming trends I underscored.
The reality is the world is already
more or less the de facto
global government run by shadow banksters with their nearly global system
of fiat currency and money that actually represents debt. Those few nations that don't comply have already been invaded (Iraq, etc), or could be as
soon as tomorrow (Iran, etc.).
Things like a AGW driven 'global government' are more in tune with an PUBLICLY OPEN EMBRACE of such a concept that if the chips were actually laid
out we'd see it anyways, for the most part. Many Texans think they're Texans, but in truth they're really United Statesians (or United Provincians
as I prefer to call it). Watch how fast Texas would be clusterbombed and brutally invaded if they actually tried to break FREE. Such a lonewolf
proposal sounds like a perfect scenario for the .gov to justify the worlds largest standing internment camp if you ask me.
The US thinks its the world. It's hardcore indoctrinated into our core. Similar to how apparently Europeans actually believe the Europe and Asia are
2 different continents... the idea that there are 7 of them when theres in truth only 6... And the madness that we here are even taught the same
lunacy from childhood.
But whoever builds the worlds first and quite likely only AGI global network... will be the 'world', per se. Herein I hardly even dabbled in the
realities of the multiple plateaus of US-EU integration... specifically the EU's own parallel NBIC / AGI programs that are impressive in their own
rights, and complementary to the US AGI programs. Nor do I recall mentioning herein China's global brain AGI projects (lead by the EU's mad
scientist Hugo de Garis). It wouldn't be too hard to draw up an outline how the US and China tyrannies are more and more one in the same.
But the point with this piece in particular was to hopefully rally people here to maybe try and stop it, here. Go from there.
It seems I should have mentioned somewhere herein that the 'total collapse' potential outcome
, which I do maintain is inevitable following
the path we're on, isn't a key in making these things come about. Instead its a very possible endgame... when they have all the pieces in place that
they need. I would never publish the notion that they would smash the entire system without having all they need first. I dont think I said that this
nightmare would be in a month (which is long past). I dont think I even put a specific 'date' of anything specific.
I dont claim to know whether or not they have 'it all in place', enough to 'smash us all out' 'once and for all'. If you dig into my body of
work you will see me say many times that I dont think thats going to come about until they can warp our brains with nanobots (hooked into said AGI).
As far as we commoners know such nanobots dont exist, nor does AGI to dominate us via them.
But then again its remarkable that DARPA / NASA / etc all have these plans and the related programs laid out right in their public websites. Many
military strategists would say they exist.